Did Warren make a bad bet?
Somehow I'd like to think that he factored in that PANAMAX will essentially be a non-term come 2014:
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB1000142 ... 85830.html
Brief passage:
Somehow I'd like to think that he factored in that PANAMAX will essentially be a non-term come 2014:
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB1000142 ... 85830.html
Brief passage:
- Did Warren Buffett buy Burlington Northern railroad just in time for freight from Asia to find a different route to Kansas?
Right now, about 70% of U.S. imports from Asia arrive by ship on the West Coast, and much of that then gets transferred to rail lines like Burlington Northern's for transit to the rest of the country.
But in 2014, Panama will rock the world of logistics. That's when it will open a fat new lane of its canal for big ships that can carry three times as much as vessels sailing the current channel. If larger vessels make it cheaper to send cargo through the canal, ports in the East and on the Gulf Coast could grab a big slice of business from the West, and thousands of jobs with it, or so one argument goes. Several logistics experts are calling the expansion a game changer and a threat to the western ports and railroads.
But in the complex calculus of supply-chain management, price is just one of many variables. The coming sea change may actually raise all boats, reducing congestion, increasing routes and trade, and forcing an overdue upgrade in U.S. infrastructure—particularly in the East.
"We believe in the ability of the West Coast ports to grow," regardless of the Panama expansion, says John Lanigan, executive vice president at Burlington Northern. His rail line is adding capacity near Long Beach, Calif.—and in Kansas too