I understand there is a proposal in the works to increase national dues in
the National Railway Historical Society by $11.00 a year. I am not in
favor of this increase and intend to vote against it. The national NRHS is
in a state of "confusion and disarray in my opinion. We get a Bulletin now
and then and it is not very often. They are around two years behind and
yet we still seldom get one. It used to be nicely done and quite
informative but now it is completely devoted to one topic and not very
informative. The Conrail issue was 90 per cent PRR and I did not get
much out of it. Every year we do not know whether we will get a dues
notice or not nor when we will get it and our cards for the new year are
sometimes delayed too.
They seem to devote a lot of their energy to the convention which few of
us can afford to go on these days. The chapters have seemed to see the
problems of trying to run a convention these days and the national seems
to have taken that over and as a result all or practically all of their efforts
and resources have gone into the convention that only a small percentage
of the members participate in.
I have been a NRHS member for almost 40 years and fully support my
chapter (Western Connecticut) but I think the national is "highballing to
nowhere".
To all NRHS members who read this, if you get a ballot in the mail or at a
meeting regarding a dues increase in the national dues, I urge you to
vote NO on any increase, especially one as high as $11.00 a year.
Noel Weaver
the National Railway Historical Society by $11.00 a year. I am not in
favor of this increase and intend to vote against it. The national NRHS is
in a state of "confusion and disarray in my opinion. We get a Bulletin now
and then and it is not very often. They are around two years behind and
yet we still seldom get one. It used to be nicely done and quite
informative but now it is completely devoted to one topic and not very
informative. The Conrail issue was 90 per cent PRR and I did not get
much out of it. Every year we do not know whether we will get a dues
notice or not nor when we will get it and our cards for the new year are
sometimes delayed too.
They seem to devote a lot of their energy to the convention which few of
us can afford to go on these days. The chapters have seemed to see the
problems of trying to run a convention these days and the national seems
to have taken that over and as a result all or practically all of their efforts
and resources have gone into the convention that only a small percentage
of the members participate in.
I have been a NRHS member for almost 40 years and fully support my
chapter (Western Connecticut) but I think the national is "highballing to
nowhere".
To all NRHS members who read this, if you get a ballot in the mail or at a
meeting regarding a dues increase in the national dues, I urge you to
vote NO on any increase, especially one as high as $11.00 a year.
Noel Weaver