I sometimes visit their site. I am not a member either. I have gotten some of my questions answered there, and I am grateful. My questions are mostly based on operations. I guess that it is because I am a railroader too. people like Noel have filled in some of the blanks.
The tone of the forum seems very pompous! One should already know everything there is to know about any given topic. If a model company comes out with a new model, they all try to pick out one rivet, which is .000000000000000000000001" off. Many of New Haven's engines had unique modifications from the standard. The low clearance cab roof of the Alco switchers comes to mind. They all jump over why the manufacturer did not make that version. Why would some company like Atlas do it to sell a hundred or so, when the return would be in their favor the standard version?
They recently had a thread about what is relevant or irrelevant. Who do they think that they are? The New Haven meant different things to different people.The whole reason that we discuss it is because of our memories. I pointed it out, but just got sarcastic replies. My uncle's return home on leave from Charleston, SC, during WWII (where he hated the Atlantic Coast Line portion of the trip) have a deep meaning to him, for example. No one else might care, but the New Haven was like his first welcome home.
My son is 3, but he likes the New Haven. When he gets old enough to dig for more details, he needn't get shunned by them because he was not born knowing everything. What a way to turn someone off!
I stopped by their booth at the Amherst show. They seemed bothered by my question about the brass sides for a streamlined car. I am glad that someone else shares my views. I don't want to see them fail. They have done some good works. I just hope that there is an attitude adjustment before much of the research scatters to the winds.
B. Burns