I did some railfan riding of Metra yesterday and it was frustrating. And while I think Metra does a very good job with rush-hour trains, I realized, much of my off-peak Metra riding is frustrating.
As you might know from what I've mentioned in other posts, I work in the transportation industry and a lot of my job is looking at performance. An old railroad adage is "late trains get later" and I think a lot of it for a reason that I see at work as well. When you have a binary on-time performance standard (a train is either on-time or it is late although on-time may include being up to a certain number of minutes late), once it is certain that a train will miss being considered on-time, people lose their focus on it. The attitude is "it's late so a few more minutes of lateness won't make a difference". And that's true for the performance measure but not for the passenger who thought the hour allowed to get to their appointment would be more than adequate and is now wondering if they will make it. I might argue that a late train should be more important as more of the passengers are "on deadline". As I've said at work and will now rephrase for Metra, "are you in the business of operating trains or moving people?" They sound the same but they aren't. If you're "operating trains", you worry about hitting the performance measures and when a train can't meet them, it becomes a low priority. "Moving passengers" means you understand that there are hundreds of passengers on that train who still want to get to their destination ASAP.
Which brings me to my big frustration which is Metra's self-induced delays due to Metra's policy of trying to cram all the passengers into as few cars as possible while hauling a bunch more around empty. After watching a couple of trains get later and later due to long station dwells, I realized that the biggest factor affecting dwell time (unless there's a wheelchair lift needs to be used) is how many doors are open. Assuming passengers evenly distributed on the train and platform, a train using six cars should be able to make a station stop in half the time of one using three cars. Now for rush-hour trains, this generally isn't a factor as all cars are open. But non-rush hour, I've decided every time I hear a train is delayed due to "passenger loads" or however it is they put it, I'm putting the delay on Metra unless they already had all the cars open.
A few times a year, we take the train into the city for a Saturday evening and take the 10:40 MD-W train home. Every time, we've arrived to find just two cars open. And every time, by 10:35, people are wandering around looking for non-existent empty seats. Finally, at 10:39, the conductor arrives at the head open car to find the mess and open at least two more cars. By the time he does that, it's 10:41 and we're already a minute down before we've even cleared the platform. And with the load now not evenly distributed, station dwell times extend due to the extended deboarding from the original two cars. I'd be really curious to know how often, if ever, that Saturday night 10:40 MD-W had been able to comfortably fit the load into two cars. My guess it's been a long time and yet Metra sticks to this silly policy of just opening two cars until it becomes obvious (again) that more space is needed.
Yesterday, I went for a round-trip up to Kenosha on the only reasonable weekend round-trip that you can do that on. Unfortunately, Metra failed to anticipate the load boarding at Ravinia Park. It was a 4:45 performance done by 7:30. Arriving Ravinia Park, somebody said on the P.A. "we've got a sea of people waiting on the platform". They knew (or should have known) how many got off there earlier in the day. So why the heck was Metra caught by surprise to find lots of people waiting to board. Yet we only initially platformed the open front four cars. Extremely slow boarding as people clogged the aisles looking for a seat. A trainman quickly opened the rest of the train but the damage had already been done. Eight (yes, eight) minutes later, they finally closed the doors - so we could pull down four car lengths and open the rear doors. Finally on the way after an 11 minutes stop. And then extended dwell at the later stops letting people off due to uneven distribution and short platforms. We went from one minute down arriving Ravinia Park to 22 minutes late into Northwestern Station. And I put it all on Metra (not the crew, but management) who could have prevented much of the delay by planning for the load that they should have known would be there (a good plan might have been, load the front four through Ravinia (the station before Ravinia Park), then at Ravinia Park, open the rear four and let "the sea of people" board empty cars. Yes, there would have been issues with downline short platforms but we had that anyway). In case you're wondering, yes, I missed my planned connection home (on the UP-W yesterday, not MD-W, and due to the lateness, it also missed the UP-NW connection at Clybourn if any was trying that) and had to wait another two hours.
I do understand why they don't want what can fit in one car to be spread across eight cars. But at some point it crosses from efficient to use fewer cars to inefficient. And when you open so few cars that planned station dwell time is exceeded, then you're really not running an efficient operations.
As you might know from what I've mentioned in other posts, I work in the transportation industry and a lot of my job is looking at performance. An old railroad adage is "late trains get later" and I think a lot of it for a reason that I see at work as well. When you have a binary on-time performance standard (a train is either on-time or it is late although on-time may include being up to a certain number of minutes late), once it is certain that a train will miss being considered on-time, people lose their focus on it. The attitude is "it's late so a few more minutes of lateness won't make a difference". And that's true for the performance measure but not for the passenger who thought the hour allowed to get to their appointment would be more than adequate and is now wondering if they will make it. I might argue that a late train should be more important as more of the passengers are "on deadline". As I've said at work and will now rephrase for Metra, "are you in the business of operating trains or moving people?" They sound the same but they aren't. If you're "operating trains", you worry about hitting the performance measures and when a train can't meet them, it becomes a low priority. "Moving passengers" means you understand that there are hundreds of passengers on that train who still want to get to their destination ASAP.
Which brings me to my big frustration which is Metra's self-induced delays due to Metra's policy of trying to cram all the passengers into as few cars as possible while hauling a bunch more around empty. After watching a couple of trains get later and later due to long station dwells, I realized that the biggest factor affecting dwell time (unless there's a wheelchair lift needs to be used) is how many doors are open. Assuming passengers evenly distributed on the train and platform, a train using six cars should be able to make a station stop in half the time of one using three cars. Now for rush-hour trains, this generally isn't a factor as all cars are open. But non-rush hour, I've decided every time I hear a train is delayed due to "passenger loads" or however it is they put it, I'm putting the delay on Metra unless they already had all the cars open.
A few times a year, we take the train into the city for a Saturday evening and take the 10:40 MD-W train home. Every time, we've arrived to find just two cars open. And every time, by 10:35, people are wandering around looking for non-existent empty seats. Finally, at 10:39, the conductor arrives at the head open car to find the mess and open at least two more cars. By the time he does that, it's 10:41 and we're already a minute down before we've even cleared the platform. And with the load now not evenly distributed, station dwell times extend due to the extended deboarding from the original two cars. I'd be really curious to know how often, if ever, that Saturday night 10:40 MD-W had been able to comfortably fit the load into two cars. My guess it's been a long time and yet Metra sticks to this silly policy of just opening two cars until it becomes obvious (again) that more space is needed.
Yesterday, I went for a round-trip up to Kenosha on the only reasonable weekend round-trip that you can do that on. Unfortunately, Metra failed to anticipate the load boarding at Ravinia Park. It was a 4:45 performance done by 7:30. Arriving Ravinia Park, somebody said on the P.A. "we've got a sea of people waiting on the platform". They knew (or should have known) how many got off there earlier in the day. So why the heck was Metra caught by surprise to find lots of people waiting to board. Yet we only initially platformed the open front four cars. Extremely slow boarding as people clogged the aisles looking for a seat. A trainman quickly opened the rest of the train but the damage had already been done. Eight (yes, eight) minutes later, they finally closed the doors - so we could pull down four car lengths and open the rear doors. Finally on the way after an 11 minutes stop. And then extended dwell at the later stops letting people off due to uneven distribution and short platforms. We went from one minute down arriving Ravinia Park to 22 minutes late into Northwestern Station. And I put it all on Metra (not the crew, but management) who could have prevented much of the delay by planning for the load that they should have known would be there (a good plan might have been, load the front four through Ravinia (the station before Ravinia Park), then at Ravinia Park, open the rear four and let "the sea of people" board empty cars. Yes, there would have been issues with downline short platforms but we had that anyway). In case you're wondering, yes, I missed my planned connection home (on the UP-W yesterday, not MD-W, and due to the lateness, it also missed the UP-NW connection at Clybourn if any was trying that) and had to wait another two hours.
I do understand why they don't want what can fit in one car to be spread across eight cars. But at some point it crosses from efficient to use fewer cars to inefficient. And when you open so few cars that planned station dwell time is exceeded, then you're really not running an efficient operations.
Larry
Reno, NV (yes, I've moved)
ex-N&W Sandusky, Ohio
Reno, NV (yes, I've moved)
ex-N&W Sandusky, Ohio