Railroad Forums
Moderators: GOLDEN-ARM, NJ Vike
SecaucusJunction wrote:STUPID RAILFAN SPECULATION..STUPID RAILFAN SPECULATION..STUPID RAILFAN SPECULATION..STUPID RAILFAN SPECULATION..STUPID RAILFAN SPECULATION..STUPID RAILFAN SPECULATION..STUPID RAILFAN SPECULATION..STUPID RAILFAN SPECULATION..STUPID RAILFAN SPECULATION..STUPID RAILFAN SPECULATION..STUPID RAILFAN SPECULATION..STUPID RAILFAN SPECULATION..STUPID RAILFAN SPECULATION..STUPID RAILFAN SPECULATION..STUPID RAILFAN SPECULATION..STUPID RAILFAN SPECULATION..STUPID RAILFAN SPECULATION..STUPID RAILFAN SPECULATION..STUPID RAILFAN SPECULATION..STUPID RAILFAN SPECULATION..STUPID RAILFAN SPECULATION..STUPID RAILFAN SPECULATION..STUPID RAILFAN SPECULATION..STUPID RAILFAN SPECULATION..Corrected, because that's all I got out of that monolog. How did the Conrail MOW Hi-Railer on the NYS&W speculation work out for you last year, SJ? The sky was supposed to be falling then too.