b&m 1566 wrote:You know... For once I'm kind of siding with Pan Am with this one. I think local law enforcement can handled issues that happen with trains going through there community. I don't see the need for a police force to watch over a freight train. If it is a Hazmat train that needs watching; a call to the state police or sheriff’s office would be sufficient enough I think. They can keep an eye on it as it passes through. However I do feel the railroad should have enough of its own police to keep an eye on the major yards. For passenger trains like that of the MBTA a police department of is own is needed given the fact that there dealing with a large amount of people.
I agree with Noel. Yes the railroad pays taxes to the local towns, and feels they should be able to get the town's police to tend to their property since they are contibuting via taxes....this seems to be CSXT's way of looking at it in the Northeast. However, there are some city cops that are clueless about railroad operations. I was once approached by an MBTA cop who looked like he was only 18 years old. He asked me who has authority to be on the right of way......I thought he was asking who controlled it, but he was asking who was allowed.....come on!!! This was a MBTA cop on a MBTA Commuter Line, how ridiculos is that!!!
As for the Pan Am/ Guilford laying off their police force, I've heard they shot themselves in the foot because most of the local law enforcement won't step foot on rr property since they are union and aren't going to help do the job of a fellow union cop who was fired in an attempt to save $$. I totally agree with that.