I'll opine with some educated guesses as to why overbuild is not under consideration. The PRR catenary structure was built sufficiently strong to carry the PRR's 132kV (now 138kV) transmission. Indeed, like much other railroad infrastructure of the era, it was likely overdesigned in strength. Eventually when the utilities approached the PRR to negotiate the lease or license for the overbuild, monopole technology and availability did not yet exist so the 230kV utility transmission was overbuilt on catenary support extensions which obviously were able to accommodate the extra static and dynamic loading. I strongly suspect that the NJ Transit catenary structure does not have the structural strength to support the proposed new 230kV line. Indeed, most if not all of the extension is built only to carry the 25kV operating conductors, no transmission. Monopole construction at the 140 foot high level can accommodate spans of 1,000 feet or even up to 1,300 or so where beneficial, resulting in the need for far fewer poles. Far fewer poles results in far fewer components such as insulators, clamps, etc. that need to be inspected and maintained periodically. Much of the inspection and maintenance work can be done by helicopter tower group personnel, thus eliminating the need to coordinate with rail operations as fouling tracks is not an issue. Moreover, from an environmental safety standpoint, since electric and magnetic field ("EMF") strength declines at a high rate of the distance squared, the monopoles will place the conductors at a much higher distance from the ground thereby reducing exposure to the public. Overall compared to other designs, monopole construction is far less expensive and more reliable which are two of criteria upon which the utility's approval application before its state and federal regulators will judge the merits of the project.
~Ken :: Fairmont ex-UP/MP C436 MT-14M1 ::
Black River Railroad Historical Trust :: [/url]