SM89 wrote:novitiate wrote:I'm guessing making it an actual entrance would require ADA elevators and such? Maybe that's the issue.
My guess is that the T has no problem making it a blue line entrance, just that it would cost a ton to make it accessible. However, it isn't clear whether the ADA says that all entrances must be accessible or that just a convenient accessible entrance must be provided. That's one of the things I hate about the ADA. It inconveniences the masses even when those with disabilities have already been addressed.
The ADA does not require elevators anywhere and everywhere. The ADA does not say that everywhere with stairs much have ramps or elevators.
Look at a stadium for example. Acres of stairs. What ADA requires is that wheelchair areas must exist, and they must be of good quality. It doesnt require that every seat be accessible.
Equal access means being able to reach the blue line by elevator, and in a ways that isnt discriminatory (discriminatory would be having to go an unreasonable distance out of the way).
"It inconveniences the masses even when those with disabilities have already been "
False. People love to blame the ADA for stuff when they have no idea what the law says and use it as a scapegoat.
Look at the new Fairmount stations, which lack stairs. ADA does NOT ban stairs, but they used that as a terrible excuse, and were immediately pointed out as being wrong.
Another example is MBTA saying they cant put the bus stop number (ie, nextbus #2445) on signs because its not ADA. Biggest load of bull on the planet, especially when it only takes two seconds to realize the rest of the sign (with the route number) isnt accessible to the blind either.
MBTA loves using ADA as a reason not to do stuff, and hopes people buy it, shrug their shoulders, and blame the feds.