3rdrail wrote:None of those places that you've mentioned can even approa inch the old Edaville. They're all point to point "demonstration" type rides, most of which go out and return on the same relatively short length of track. At Edaville, you had five plus miles of varied ROW (not the same thing after 1/2 the trip) in an elyptical route, original old coaches giving one the impression of what a trip on a 1800's narrow guage passenger train must have truely been like. I don't know of any other museum of it's type that has or had that style of realism. Edaville's location was such that it was accesible from major population centers for an evening out at Christmas time with the family, not in some remote location requiring a long drive to get to. Throw in with that the tradition of Edaville, it's history, the people that originally created it, the fact that it was a working cranberry harvesting railroad, the added touches such as the fantastic railway museum where you could find really unique railway items from the past while warming up, the annual Christmas lights display, the multi-gauged display of other engines and locomotives (see avatar), the huge and spectacular annual railroad flea market held, and the fact that so many people in Massachusetts, Rhode Island, and Connecticut remember this magical place from their youth and wanted to have their kids and grand kids now experience it as well.
I'm a realist Cosmo. I live for the present and enjoy what's now. That doesn't mean that I and others can't and shouldn't be pissed off by the actions of others in what we percieve as the ruination of a special place.
So, what you're telling me is that what EDAville had that none of the other operations have now is,... cranberries? No, I hear what you're saying Paul, and I'm just as pissed. Could they have maybe kept at least one of the original M2F engines and some of the original coaches at EDAville? Maybe.
But let me address some of the other arguments:
"original old coaches giving one the impression of what a trip on a 1800's narrow guage passenger train must have truly been like."
Dude,... they're the SAME COACHES! If you want to know what a trip on an 1800's passenger train was like, WW&F is by far the CLOSEST thing North of the Brazos and East of the Hudson!
That, and they have hay rides, a bonfire, and some AWESOME folks who I've gotten to know well over the years that I now know far better than I would the vendors at EDAville now. Now, 20 years ago, this was not so! WW&FRR did not EXIST as a functioning railroad, MNGR's stuff was all still at EDAville.
"I don't know of any other museum of it's type that has or had that style of realism." On THIS point, WW&F would definitely win over MNGR, but again, it's the SAME EQUIPMENT! The "authenticity" at EDAville past was all in the equipment, and the fact that the park was built as a functioning railroad. Honestly, Valley RR in Essex has a much higher degree of "authenticity" than the current EDAville. But I most certainly agree the EDAville of today is NOT "authentic" to the EDAville I grew up with.
I guess it all depends on your definition of "authenticity," which really boils down to what you want, expect, etc. And that's a matter of personal preference, so I'm NOT going to argue that because nobody wins in that kind of argument.
But my whole point is that, while I share the frustration of you, Paul, and many others here in what has happened to EDAville over the years, I gave up a while back on it ever being what it used to be. Oh, I still hope it could one day, again, be something a bit closer to the EDAville we all knew and loved, but I've since found other places, each with their own flavor and style of magic to bring my daughter to, spring, summer and winter.
Peace, yo.