http://trn.trains.com/news/news-wire/20 ... ntial-sale." onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;. here we go. Hard to believe some of these but apparently the for sale sign is truly going to happen on many lines
Railroad Forums
Moderator: Otto Vondrak
RMB357 wrote:Some reports say NS could be a possible suitor for the Boston line but with the current agreement with Pan Am ownership of the Patriot corridor not sure how that would all legally play out.I don't see how that is possible. Theres no connection on west end. I believe that CSX intended to sell that line for shortline to serve customers.
sd80mac wrote:RMB357 wrote:Some reports say NS could be a possible suitor for the Boston line but with the current agreement with Pan Am ownership of the Patriot corridor not sure how that would all legally play out.I don't see how that is possible. Theres no connection on west end. I believe that CSX intended to sell that line for shortline to serve customers.
Amtrak probably wouldn't let NS or CP touch their connection from Troy to B&A. Or CSX letting NS to run through their line to get to B&A
johnpbarlow wrote:I am pretty sure that CSX will NOT HAND OVER their businesses to NS... The way they let some of these lines go is to turn them over to shortlines and still have the businesses from customers on these when they interchange with CSX.. the lines are strategic cut off that no other competitors can take over. (I don't know nor am familiar with other lines somewhere else whether they have connections with other class 1 competitors..) Sand Patch ... I am not sure if it have any connections with NS or not...sd80mac wrote:RMB357 wrote:Some reports say NS could be a possible suitor for the Boston line but with the current agreement with Pan Am ownership of the Patriot corridor not sure how that would all legally play out.I don't see how that is possible. Theres no connection on west end. I believe that CSX intended to sell that line for shortline to serve customers.
Amtrak probably wouldn't let NS or CP touch their connection from Troy to B&A. Or CSX letting NS to run through their line to get to B&A
As far as I know, NS owns the track or RoW of the ex-D&H Albany main from Delanson to Voorheesville Jct, which is where the CSX Selkirk branch is. As I understand things, while the track is still in place from the spur that SMS uses to access North East Industrial Park at Guilderland up to the CSX main, the switch between the ex-D&H and CSX has been removed. But it certainly wouldn't be impossible to replace it. If NS were to gain ownership or access rights to the B&A via a re-instated Voorheesville connection, clearly CSX would need to give NS trackage rights from Voorheesville to CP-SK.
URL to Google Maps aerial the remaining east end of the ex-D&H Albany main (should be able to zoom in for detailed study):
https://www.google.com/maps/place/Voorh ... 73.9287365
sd80mac wrote:I am pretty sure that CSX will NOT HAND OVER their businesses to NS... The way they let some of these lines go is to turn them over to shortlines and still have the businesses from customers on these when they interchange with CSX.. the lines are strategic cut off that no other competitors can take over.Agreed -especially in the case of the B&A. NS already has a toehold on New England. Foote and his henchmen are smart enough to not hand over a competing route which could potentially make NS the dominant Class I in that market. IMO, I don't think CSX will sell the B&A. Just as they supposedly studied Selkirk's hump and ultimately kept it, CSX will decide the B&A has enough strategic value to keep.
KenK wrote:I know it hasn't been mentioned as a possible sale, but the Compromise and the Niagara Branches in Buffalo may also be on the block in the future.The Trains article mentioned it, I quote directly from the article "Branches and redundant trackage scattered around the system, including some in Alabama, Connecticut, Georgia, Illinois, Indiana, Ohio, and New York." Specific line names are not being giving to the press, but we know what they are.