• CSX Acquisition of Pan Am Railways

  • Guilford Rail System changed its name to Pan Am Railways in 2006. Discussion relating to the current operations of the Boston & Maine, the Maine Central, and the Springfield Terminal railroads (as well as the Delaware & Hudson while it was under Guilford control until 1988). Official site can be found here: PANAMRAILWAYS.COM.
Guilford Rail System changed its name to Pan Am Railways in 2006. Discussion relating to the current operations of the Boston & Maine, the Maine Central, and the Springfield Terminal railroads (as well as the Delaware & Hudson while it was under Guilford control until 1988). Official site can be found here: PANAMRAILWAYS.COM.

Moderator: MEC407

  by Gilbert B Norman
 
Wonder same myself, Mr. Train Guy.

If the US East Coast Longshoremen go out - and are out for any period of time. Montreal, Saint John, and Halifax will be the only Deepwater ports available. No doubt they all will be "busy" and back to the COVID days of "find me a berth; any berth".

Problem of course for Chessie to participate in the flood of traffic is the decrepit Maine Central. Sure Chessie wants an FRA Class 3 (40mph) road handling double stacks and auto racks, but she simply isn't there yet. So, I see no alternative other than ceding the influx of traffic to CN and CPKC
  by newpylong
 
Doublestacks no but the entire MEC mainline between Rigby and Keag is 25 to 40 MPH. Hardly decrepit even with plenty of stick to replace.

I would think if the Canadian ports need to make up for the loss of the US ports then there will be enough carloads to go around. They can't do racks but CSX can just single stack if they can offer a competitive routing to the south.
  by Gilbert B Norman
 
Glad to learn, Mr. Newpy, that the MEC is not as decrepit as I had been led to believe, but based upon the photos some fellow shared here taken around Keag, it sure looked like FRA "Excepted" (dead slow).

Now so far as the clearance matter, you are much closer to "the action" (even if you have chosen to leave the industry - hey I did after eleven years) than I. If you hold that even handling Containers single stacked, and ceding the Bennies and Bimmers to CPKC and a through Canada routing even if consigned to "The States', Chessie can be in the game, great!!!! And all the more "great" when she can address the MEC clearance issues.

Finally, so far as jointed rail (stick rail in "fanese") goes, it was good enough for 98% of the miles on the MILW (couldn't afford to replace it as the end drew nigh).
  by newpylong
 
Winn to Keag is other than main it's going to be slow at Restricted speed.
  by F74265A
 
Track aside, i doubt short term that any of csx, cpkc or nbsr have crews available for more trains even if more traffic wss theoretically available short term. And the port and cpkc got overwhelmed and backed up last time there was a container surge in saint john
  by KuBand12
 
F74265A wrote: Sat Sep 21, 2024 8:30 am Track aside, i doubt short term that any of csx, cpkc or nbsr have crews available for more trains even if more traffic wss theoretically available short term. And the port and cpkc got overwhelmed and backed up last time there was a container surge in saint john
From recent history, I am inclined to think that Saint John is focusing on a "slow and steady wins the race" approach to all the contract issues/opportunities of late. Saint John has been operating on an expected 160 to 200K turnaround this year. If attempting to maybe double that rate(or more), even for a short term, destroys your ability to deliver your existing long term business, it is not good strategy.

There appears to be an equipment related maximum of 200K or so because of cranes, docking, laydown space, rail, etc.,. Those things are all being dealt with, but nothing is going to change in the next week. And nobody appears to be making strategic decisions based on unpredictable short term situations.

Whatever happens, it is likely not going to last long. It's results will be felt long after all the contracts are signed, so even putting a few extra containers through is not going to change much.

One thing that hasn't been mentioned is how much the union will be involved here. Saint John has been ILA local 273 since 1911. Maybe nothing officially, but I wouldn't assume anything unofficially.
  by rxr717
 
I’m sure many of you guys know that the line off of Rockingham Jct (Portsmouth branch), had a fire at the trestle that crosses the over southern part of Great Bay. Does anyone have any intel on status? Do they plan to just rebuild with wooden beams or add a steel structure?
  by MEC407
 
The bridge fire is being discussed in the Portsmouth Branch thread, which you can find here:

https://railroad.net/portsmouth-branch-activity-t84166-1680.html#p1656837
  • 1
  • 311
  • 312
  • 313
  • 314
  • 315