by Pacobell73
Since the original Lackawanna Cutoff discussion is locked (nice going, guys!) http://www.railroad.net/forums/viewtopi ... nna+cutoff, I will ask my question here.
Conrail dismantled many, many lines in their existance. They often did it neatly and cleanly, without leaving anything behind. Why then did they only remove the rails on the Lackawanna Cutoff? Signals and, more noticable, crossties, still remain in place. It is so rare today today to find an abandoned rail corridor with the crossties left embedded in the earth, ballast, even the grade crossings (that last one being a non-issue for the Cutoff).
Any takers?
Conrail dismantled many, many lines in their existance. They often did it neatly and cleanly, without leaving anything behind. Why then did they only remove the rails on the Lackawanna Cutoff? Signals and, more noticable, crossties, still remain in place. It is so rare today today to find an abandoned rail corridor with the crossties left embedded in the earth, ballast, even the grade crossings (that last one being a non-issue for the Cutoff).
Any takers?

"A train running once a week is better than no train at all." - Me