BandA wrote: ↑Wed Feb 01, 2023 2:35 pm
I'd rather see realistic, sensible legislation than fantasy talking points. This kind of unserious legislation makes the no-build option look good.
Anyone who knows anything about transportation, even the less-intelligent folks who may work at the T, know the timeline isn't realistic.
How about making the proposal a little more realistic?
It's like the Red Sox with Xander Bogaerts or John Lester. They gave low-ball, practically insulting offers to both. The players were like, "forget this, the team is not serious." They both left the team. The T sees this asinine timeline and isn't going to work with the Hill. They figure it's a waste of time.