Railroad Forums 

  • Closing EL verses PRR in Midwest

  • Discussion related to the operations and equipment of Consolidated Rail Corp. (Conrail) from 1976 to its present operations as Conrail Shared Assets. Official web site can be found here: CONRAIL.COM.
Discussion related to the operations and equipment of Consolidated Rail Corp. (Conrail) from 1976 to its present operations as Conrail Shared Assets. Official web site can be found here: CONRAIL.COM.

Moderators: TAMR213, keeper1616

 #1318647  by CPF363
 
What was the reason as to why Conrail decided to abandon the Erie Lackawanna across Ohio and Indiana verses the abandonment of the former PRR Fort Wayne Line? Was there any attempt to retain the EL over the PRR considering the EL was double stack ready in the 1970s? Did Conrail ever look into closing both the EL and the PRR but decided to retain one of the routes as a overflow or detour line?
 #1318721  by charlie6017
 
I think a good part of it was Amtrak using the PRR route for the "Broadway Limited" and to a lesser extent, there
were commuter runs from Valparaiso, IN back and forth to Chicago. I can't speak for whether there was much in
the way of online-customers on the PRR-line but I know there weren't too many customers on the EL west of Marion.

Charlie
 #1319143  by CPF363
 
Seems that there would be some incentive to retain the old EL with the large yard in Marion being at the junction point of the EL's New York City to Chicago line and the NYC's St. Louis to Cleveland former Big Four route.
 #1319157  by charlie6017
 
CPF363 wrote:Seems that there would be some incentive to retain the old EL with the large yard in Marion being at the junction point of the EL's New York City to Chicago line and the NYC's St. Louis to Cleveland former Big Four route.
Ordinarily that would be ideal, but the problem there was the yard at Marion was in deplorable shape. The track was
shot, the mechanisms on the hump were outdated and not working and Conrail at that time wasn't in position to spend
the money required to make it worthwhile--not with somewhat nearby Buckeye Yard in Columbus being built only 8 years
prior. Also, Erie Lackawanna was a very late addition into Conrail. That also factored some into the equation, too.

Charlie
 #1319174  by Zeke
 
There were a number of reasons I believe and I heard this from some E-L bosses that wound up in Conrail. The west end suffered from deferred maintenance in it's last years. CR had no intention of rebuilding a third NY-CHI mainline across western Ohio and Indiana or let a competitor RR like the Santa Fe, NW or C & O use the west end to compete in CR's market. The Erie Western Railway, The Spencerville and Elgin and a few other shortlines tried to make a go of it but all succumbed after a few years. Marion was scheduled for a first class rebuild in the early 70's but June 1972's Hurricane Agnes so devastated E-L finances the 9 million dollars allocated for a state of the art hump yard was tabled forever. The west end's time was up.
 #1410480  by Matt Langworthy
 
A few observations:

1. The Spencerville & Elgin RR still operates today under the ownership of RJ Corman. The track has been removed in Ohio City, but it is otherwise active.

2. I agree with the comment about EL being late to the CR merger. With that being said, the EL main west of Sterling, OH wouldn't have survived if Chessie had acquired the line.

3. Both the USRA and CR were heavily staffed by former PC employees at the management level. The former PRR mains (both Panhandle and Fort Wayne Line) weren't in better shape than EL's west end by 1976, based on the photos I've seen. I've also read that the EL shops in Marion were in better shape than the PC shops in Columbus. PC lines received better treatment IMO because of old rivalries, as well as EL's late inclusion to CR.