by Jeff Smith
Wait, these were two separate orders? As I understood it, it was one order for 60 cars that had an error in the bonding agenda item thus leading everyone to think it was 72, with 12 cars for Waterbury. My point being, I don't think they would have mixed the order just bonded for CTRail with cars for MNRR which would be pool cars. Which is why the CTRail cars don't have to be compatible (although it's not a bad idea for future flexibility) and don't need GCT accessibility (no plans anytime soon for either of those services to run to GCT). As for Waterbury and GCT compatible, yes, that would make sense for equipment turns even if there's never a Waterbury through train. But then, I'd make the Waterbury branch a CTRail operation under contract like Hartford Line with a Devon transfer, never to see the main line again lol.
Next stop, Willoughby
~el Jefe ("Jeff Smith Rules") :: RAILROAD.NET Site Administrator/Co-Owner
~el Jefe ("Jeff Smith Rules") :: RAILROAD.NET Site Administrator/Co-Owner