markhb wrote: ↑Fri Aug 02, 2024 2:37 pm
Half as Interesting just posted a video on this exact subject:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ShmVne51sF4
I am sure that some of the recent articles mentioned in this thread inspired him/them to produce the piece.
This video spends more time talking about the locations, reasons and histories of the 25Hz/60Hz systems than it does about how fixed termination vs. constant tension catenary works. The isolation and unique nature of the 25Hz system has nothing to do with catenary damage (and a few signal power) incidents of the last 4 months. There are plenty of criticisms of the signal power architecture and catenary configuration but the isolation of the system and its use of 25Hz is not usually one of them.
I challenge anyone to find reported problems or outages with the transmission system within the last year. The 6/20 issue might qualify as such but the details are hard to find.
I'd argue the 25Hz system as it is makes it extremely resilient against local utility failures. Amtrak can probably lose more than one supply (of about 10) and still be able to keep trains running. It may mean more costs for Amtrak but the bare minimum maintenance on the system is still pretty good. Aging components are probably a bigger issue. I believe a typical 60Hz/3 phase rail system lacks redundancy if a single connection point is lost unless the system is ridiculously overengineered. If anyone knows better, please correct me.
25Hz ain't going anywhere and this hilarious comment sums it up:
American rail having multiple incompatible electrification methods is the most European thing I've heard all week.
For anyone not aware yet, "Half as Interesting" is a "light" version of "Wendover Productions". The long form videos are way better presented and better researched.