by Tadman
STrRedWolf wrote: ↑Wed Jul 03, 2024 5:57 am If they gave a damn about the equipment, they'd stay away from the Talgos because Shortcut Accident. We have too many threads to point to over the accident near Seattle and how badly the Talgos performed there, the ban on the equipment at the state level, and their final destination. I'm not up to rehashing that.This is the most baseless claim of the decade here.
Airplanes are not built for passengers to survive a plane falling out of the sky at hundreds of miles per hour. The standards of commercial flight and maintenance are such that there should be no planes falling out of the sky, so planes are not built to survive a crash from altitude.
The Talgo crash also shouldn't have happened. Full stop. There was inadequate training on a new route and the engineer broke the speed limit. For some reason we still continue to build trains to a crash survival strength standard promulgated by the post office in pre-1920 times in order to preserve the mail in event of a crash. Do some deep digging, this is where our crash survival strength numbers come from. Not a modern scientific study (and by modern I mean the era of diesel engines, steel passenger cars, polio survival, microwave ovens, the internet, plastics, my grandparents being born...)
by David Benton » Thu Jul 04, 2024 12:36 amNo he probably doesn't.
Does your average rider remember it was Talgo equipment in the crash, or even what equipment is what.?
Amtrak is proud to announce a new train to Florida that doesn't stink: The Floaterian. An all-star just like Babe Ruth.