Can someone explain the reasons why when a RR requests from the ICC that a line be abandoned, that the state in which it resides could not "take over" the line? This could prevent it from being torn up and sold and kept for potential future use for light rail.
I may be oversimplifying but it seems that most lines are abandoned because the revenue is not in excess of service costs and taxes. I also assume that at the time of ICC request, there wasn't a short line asking the class 1 to handle the traffic for them either.
But, after abandonment, it seems that the rails get taken up and then the good folks along the line get used to the peaceful tranquility of their backyard and if the City with traffic problems wants to add or expand the light rail system, the NIMBY's bring out the lawyers.
If the state owned the lines after abandonment, they would be no worse off as far as taxes, they could negotiate with a short line at some future date to expand service on the line and perhaps even offer "subsidies"(horrors!) to get some trucks off the roads. How long before the solution to traffic congestion problems is NOT widen the roads, make more lanes, add more outer loops, keep more construction firms repaving.
How long before Walmart decides that since all it's merchandise(except food) comes off the boat from China at Longbeach and onto rails and could be delivered in those big containers to its backdoor if they put the new Mega Walmart near a rail line?
Thanks for your insights...
Tom
I may be oversimplifying but it seems that most lines are abandoned because the revenue is not in excess of service costs and taxes. I also assume that at the time of ICC request, there wasn't a short line asking the class 1 to handle the traffic for them either.
But, after abandonment, it seems that the rails get taken up and then the good folks along the line get used to the peaceful tranquility of their backyard and if the City with traffic problems wants to add or expand the light rail system, the NIMBY's bring out the lawyers.
If the state owned the lines after abandonment, they would be no worse off as far as taxes, they could negotiate with a short line at some future date to expand service on the line and perhaps even offer "subsidies"(horrors!) to get some trucks off the roads. How long before the solution to traffic congestion problems is NOT widen the roads, make more lanes, add more outer loops, keep more construction firms repaving.
How long before Walmart decides that since all it's merchandise(except food) comes off the boat from China at Longbeach and onto rails and could be delivered in those big containers to its backdoor if they put the new Mega Walmart near a rail line?
Thanks for your insights...
Tom