• Acela speed limits: NHV to BOS

  • Discussion related to Amtrak also known as the National Railroad Passenger Corp.
Discussion related to Amtrak also known as the National Railroad Passenger Corp.

Moderators: GirlOnTheTrain, mtuandrew, Tadman

  by The EGE
 
Apparently having too much time on my hands, I put together a map showing Acela speed limits from Division Post in New Haven to South Station in Boston.

It's based off a several-year-old timetable; I welcome any corrections.
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
  by joshg1
 
Your document contains no data my computer will show. I'm less curious about software than speeds from South Station down to 128. I was shooting photos in Readville/Hyde Park Sunday around 5PM. I caught a few commuters and a NB regional, but I was a few hundred feet from the line in no position to see approaching trains when I heard a bang and a SB Acela zoomed by before I could adjust my camera. I'm also curious about the ride quality at different speeds on different sections, but 1- too cheap to buy a ticket for curiosity; 2- this question has probably been addressed in a forum I haven't found yet.
  by shadyjay
 
Pretty cool map!

You need to have Google Earth installed on your computer for it to run.

From Mass Ave/Boston down to 128, it's 120 to Readville, then 130 south to 128.
  by bostontrainguy
 
EGE:
Great job here. I have an original NEC improvement plan from Amtrak here somewhere and it will be interesting to compare them.
  by Stephen B. Carey
 
Great map! That was a lot of fun to look at.
  by The EGE
 
Glad I could provide some entertainment. A link for those without Google Earth: https://maps.google.com/maps/ms?msid=21 ... 8,2.705383

I can't promise stability on that link, but the kml will last indefinitely.

I'll try to do some more when I've got blocks of free time. The timetable I've got should cover NYP-WAS, PHL-HBG, and NHV-SPG, and I've randomly got a Michigan time timetable as well. If anyone has a scanned copy of a New Haven Line timetable they're willing to send me, I'd be infinitely grateful.
  by boblothrope
 
bostontrainguy wrote:EGE:
Great job here. I have an original NEC improvement plan from Amtrak here somewhere and it will be interesting to compare them.
I'd like to see a comparison of the proposed speed limits when they thought they could do New York to Boston in 3 hours, and the actual speed limits that exist today.

Is any of the slowdown north of New Haven, or is it all on Metro North territory?
  by bostontrainguy
 
boblothrope wrote:
bostontrainguy wrote:EGE:
Great job here. I have an original NEC improvement plan from Amtrak here somewhere and it will be interesting to compare them.
I'd like to see a comparison of the proposed speed limits when they thought they could do New York to Boston in 3 hours, and the actual speed limits that exist today.

Is any of the slowdown north of New Haven, or is it all on Metro North territory?
I will have to dig it up and post the info.
  by bostontrainguy
 
Here is the proposed AMTRAK NEC HIGH SPEED CONFIGURATION
Dated 11/18/1994

APPROX MILE/LOCATION

229.00 - BOS SOUTH STATION

45 MPH

227.00 - BOS BACK BAY

140 MPH
225.50
125 MPH
225.00
135 MPH
224.75
140 MPH
221.00
135 MPH
220.50
150 MPH
216.00
140 MPH

215.00 - ROUTE 128

140 MPH
206.75
135 MPH
206.25
140 MPH
205.00
150 MPH
194.75
110 MPH
194.00
150 MPH (?) QUestion Mark on this section
190.50
70 MPH
189.50
100 MPH
188.00
85 MPH
187.75
100 MPH
187.50
100 MPH
186.00
65 MPH
185.50
80 MPH

185.00 - PROVIDENCE

80 MPH
182.25
65 MPH
181.75
105 MPH
180.00
125 MPH
172.75
115 MPH
171.50
120 MPH
170.25
150 MPH
160.75
140 MPH
159.75
150 MPH

158.00 - KINGSTON

150 MPH
154.50
100 MPH
154.00
110 MPH
152.50
95 MPH
152.00
110 MPH
151.25
100 mph
150.75
110 mph
148.00
100 mph
147.50
110 mph
145.50
110 mph
144.50
100 MPH
144.00
110 MPH
142.25
90 MPH
141.75
100 MPH

141.50 - WESTERY

100 MPH
136.50
70 MPH
135.75
80 MPH
134.50
90 MPH
134.00
75 MPH
133.50
85 MPH

133.00 - MYSTIC

85 MPH
132.50
70 MPH - MYSTIC RIVER SWING
132.00
85 MPH
130.00
75 MPH
129.25
85 MPH
126.50
70 MPH
126.25
80 MPH
125.50
65 MPH
125.25
80 MPH
124.00
65 MPH - THAMES RIVER DRAW
123.50
50 MPH

123.00 - NEW LONDON

35 MPH
122.75
55 MPH - SHAWS COVE DRAW
122.25
80 MPH
121.25
70 MPH
120.75
80 MPH
117.00
90 MPH - NIANTIC RIVER DRAW
112.75
80 MPH
112.25
75 MPH
112.00
90 MPH
110.00
100 MPH
107.25
95 MPH
106.75
75 MPH - CONN RIVER DRAW
106.00
100 MPH

105.00 - OLD SAYBROOK

100 MPH
104.00
90 MPH
103.50
100 MPH
102.00
85 MPH
101.75
100 MPH
99.75
120 MPH
96.50
110 MPHY
96.00
120 MPH
94.75
90 MPH
94.25
120 MPH
93.25
105 MPH
92.75
120 MPH
87.50
90 MPH
87.00
115 MPH
86.00
95 MPH
85.50
115 MPH
82.00
65 MPH
81.25
70 MPH
81.00
75 MPH
74.00
55 MPH
73.25
50 MPH

72.00 - NEW HAVEN

NO FURTHER INFO
  by The EGE
 
The slowdowns at East Haven, Westerly, and in the straight section between Providence and Pawtucket seem like they're capable of faster speeds.
  by afiggatt
 
bostontrainguy wrote:Here is the proposed AMTRAK NEC HIGH SPEED CONFIGURATION
Dated 11/18/1994

APPROX MILE/LOCATION
...
117.00
90 MPH - NIANTIC RIVER DRAW
Thanks for posting that. And thanks to The EGE for posting the kml file. Interesting to look at the route and see where the slow sections are.

One that has jumped out to me before is the short curve or bump at MP 112.8 that has a 70 mph max speed. It looks like it could be straightened out, but the tracks are going through Rocky Neck State Park, which means that it probably would be very difficult to take a small slice of state park land to straighten the ROW. At least the Niantic River bridge, after all these years, will finally be fixed with the tracks moved to the new bridge very soon.

Worth contemplating how many of the 90 mph or slower sections could be sped up by 10 to 20 mph. It looks like a number of the 90 mph segments could be upgraded to 100 mph ranges. I would like to see Amtrak and the FRA in cooperation with CDOT, possibly as part of the Tier I EIS process that is underway, come up with a specific list of projects and improvements that would achieve a scheduled 3 hour or better NYP-BOS Acela trip time (with the normal Acela stops). If some of the projects are expensive, so be it. Lay them out on the table for discussion.

Would it add anything to the kml overlay to mark where the remaining grade crossings are on the Shore Line East?
  by bostontrainguy
 
afiggatt wrote:
bostontrainguy wrote:Here is the proposed AMTRAK NEC HIGH SPEED CONFIGURATION
Dated 11/18/1994

APPROX MILE/LOCATION
...
117.00
90 MPH - NIANTIC RIVER DRAW
Thanks for posting that. And thanks to The EGE for posting the kml file. Interesting to look at the route and see where the slow sections are.

One that has jumped out to me before is the short curve or bump at MP 112.8 that has a 70 mph max speed. It looks like it could be straightened out, but the tracks are going through Rocky Neck State Park, which means that it probably would be very difficult to take a small slice of state park land to straighten the ROW. At least the Niantic River bridge, after all these years, will finally be fixed with the tracks moved to the new bridge very soon.

Worth contemplating how many of the 90 mph or slower sections could be sped up by 10 to 20 mph. It looks like a number of the 90 mph segments could be upgraded to 100 mph ranges. I would like to see Amtrak and the FRA in cooperation with CDOT, possibly as part of the Tier I EIS process that is underway, come up with a specific list of projects and improvements that would achieve a scheduled 3 hour or better NYP-BOS Acela trip time (with the normal Acela stops). If some of the projects are expensive, so be it. Lay them out on the table for discussion.

Would it add anything to the kml overlay to mark where the remaining grade crossings are on the Shore Line East?
I thought that the S curve through the Rocky Neck State Park would be easier to remedy than taking private property. There would be ledge to remove and the parking lot would have to be moved back, but if they can't do this on State property where can they do it?

As far as the grade crossings go, this proposal eliminates every grade crossing. I would question the value of that especially around New London and Mystic where the train runs relatively slowly and the work would be difficult. I had the opportunity to ride an Amfleet train on the corridor with a speed calculating GPS. We hit 127 mph through Mansfield, MA, but otherwise we ran through every existing grade crossing far below the maximum 110 mph allowed. I think beefed-up safety systems could be used instead of expensive eliminations at most of the existing crossings.
  by The EGE
 
The grade crossings not at stations (especially Miner's Lane in Waterford, and the rural ones out near Stonington) are easy eliminations. Mansfield no longer has any grade crossings - all remaining are in southeastern CT.

The Rocky Neck section is through a deep cut near the 1930s-built park house. It's also in a 90-only section with curves at South Lyme and Niantic that can't be improved much. I'd say there are other priorities for speeding up the corridor, the first of which should be the CT River bridge.
  by afiggatt
 
bostontrainguy wrote: I thought that the S curve through the Rocky Neck State Park would be easier to remedy than taking private property. There would be ledge to remove and the parking lot would have to be moved back, but if they can't do this on State property where can they do it?

As far as the grade crossings go, this proposal eliminates every grade crossing. I would question the value of that especially around New London and Mystic where the train runs relatively slowly and the work would be difficult. I had the opportunity to ride an Amfleet train on the corridor with a speed calculating GPS. We hit 127 mph through Mansfield, MA, but otherwise we ran through every existing grade crossing far below the maximum 110 mph allowed. I think beefed-up safety systems could be used instead of expensive eliminations at most of the existing crossings.
Looking it up, Rocky Neck State Park is 710 acres and the land was originally acquired by conservationists in 1931. The transfer of the property to the state may have come with an agreement that the land will remain protected state park land forever. Baring those sort of restrictions, that the land is a State Park means that it is subject to laws restricting the use of and protecting the land. Since it is a public park, there would be multiple interest groups that would be involved in transferring any of the land. Even if it were a land swap with the ROW and tracks moved north 100' or 150' and the land used by the current tracks transferred back to the park after being cleaned up. Acquiring a piece of private property through eminent domain is likely far easier, even if the private property owner has heavy hitter law firms entered into his iPhone.

As for the grade crossings, removing as many of the 11 remaining as can be done them would improve safety and reliability of the NEC. Fewer grade crossings mean fewer opportunities for a truck to get hung up on the tracks causing the trains to stop & wait for the truck to get towed or for some oblivious idiot busy texting on the smartphone to drive through the lowered gates. The cost of the grade separation would not necessarily come from NEC improvement funds. Could tap FRA grade separation and state & federal road safety funds for pay for much or all of it. If the grade separation is a bridge over the tracks, maybe CT DOT highway department should pick up the bulk of the tab under the excuse of providing unrestricted emergency services access.

It also does not take much imagination to see a scenario in a place like the CT coast where because of the movable bridge improvements and replacements, the Coast Guard relents and allows Amtrak and SLE to run an additional 10 or 12 trains a day through eastern CT. Then the politically well connected locals living south of some of the grade crossings get up in arms because of the traffic delays by additional trains running through their crossing. The local communities might not have much of a legal argument, but political connections and influence can trump that. Fewer grade crossings mean less exposure to local politics.
  by The EGE
 
None of the grade crossings except Palmer Street in Pawcatuck (an easy elimination) and Ferry Street in New London (adjacent to station) are locally important roads.

From Wikipedia:

Stonington:
Palmer Street (Pawcatuck): Connects the Pawcatuck residential neighborhood to Mechanic Street along the Pawcatuck River.
Elihu Island Road: Access to Elihu Island
Walker's Dock: Access to this small marina
Wamphassuc Crossing: Access to the upscale residences on Wamphassuc Point
Latimer Point Road: Access to the summer cottages on Latimer Point
Broadway (Mystic): Access to the eastbound train platform at the Mystic Depot, and to marinas that line the north shore of Mystic Harbor.
Groton:
School Street: Provides access to marinas and residences on Willow Point in West Mystic. This was the first quad-gate installation in the United States, dating from 1998.
New London:
Ferry Street: Access to ferries to Block Island and Orient Point, Long Island
State Street: Access to the City Pier, Waterfront Park, and the Fisher's Island Ferry
Bank Street Connector: Pedestrian access to the Waterfront Park
Waterford:
Miner Lane: Access to a few residences and industrial businesses.