gardendance wrote:I'd guess if all other things are equal, concrete ties must be heavier than wood ties, so would sink deeper into the mud, and aggravate the pumping other posters have mentioned.
True, that doesn't help either, but remember wood absorbs water, concrete doesn't. So on a rainy day, with lots of rain falling down, a Concrete tied track is going to have more water pushed into the dirt/ballast as opposed to the wooden ties. More water in the ballast/dirt makes more mud. More mud equals more "mud pumps" which equals more bumps and dips and sags in the track structure.
It seems from my own observations, that concrete ties are very good, but simply cannot always be replaced 1:1 with wood ties without some additional drainage improvements to the track, especially if there are some poor drainage or sub-roadbed conditions.
While the stretch on the RVL by the Cush/Tunk siding seems to be pretty well built and has adequate drainage (not in a cut, or flatland, etc), I suspect that up there, the composition of the ground might be what is causing hte problems up there with the extra water not being absorbed by the concrete ties and pooling and making mud is what is causing the problems up there....
again, these are only my observations about it, Im not THAT kind of engineer, but I do have some experience in dealing with some water/drainage issues and soil composition etc.