Railroad Forums 

  • 1st Generation SD-series official thread (all variations)

  • Discussion of Electro-Motive locomotive products and technology, past and present. Official web site can be found here: http://www.emdiesels.com/.
It is currently Fri Apr 19, 2024 5:58 pm

1st Generation SD-series official thread (all variations)

Discussion of Electro-Motive locomotive products and technology, past and present. Official web site can be found here: http://www.emdiesels.com/.

Moderator: GOLDEN-ARM

 Reply

 #291563  by pablo
 
Golden Arm, I was tightening the bolt on the + on top of the battery when the head of the wrench touched the side of the compartment as it tighetned the bolt. God bless the rubber handles...

I tried to track down a 70 tonner a few years ago. Two in fact. One vaoprized, apparently; no one knows after it got to A. Merilees. The other was scrapped mere months before I started looking.

Good luck...

Dave Becker

 #291567  by GOLDEN-ARM
 
Not much you can do about that, other than use rubberized tools, or place a fender protector on the lip of the battery box. The hot will always go to ground, when the opportunity presents itself........... :P

 #291981  by mxdata
 
So has anyone posting on this forum run one of these new locomotives yet? Is the selection of the number of running engines done manually by the engineer, or is there a sensing circuit that brings them on line as needed?

 #291995  by pablo
 
Everything I've seen says it's autmoatic on such units, but I don't know if an engineer could manually bring online more than were needed.

Dave Becker

 #292005  by mxdata
 
If it is automatic, one question would be whether the fuel economy that is being quoted is based on the manufacturers BSFC data for the engines (done on a test stand) or the actual operation of the locomotive. If the system is automatic and it takes a couple seconds to start and load another engine when it is needed (starting into a grade, for example), you need to anticipate that and do the start before the one on line gets overloaded. This uses fuel in the starting and restoring the air or charging the battery after the start, this usage would not be reflected in manufacturers fuel consumption figures. If they have layover heaters powered by the running unit to keep the others up to temperature that consumes fuel too. It will be interesting to see how the engines stand up to constant thermal cycles of starting and stopping, there are relatively few other diesel applications that operate this way. The closest service to this that I have seen is backup generators at server farms or nuke plants, but they have a minimum run time once they start to keep from doing very short thermal cycles, maybe this does too.

On the other hand, if the engineer can override the system, there is the possibility for all the engines to end up on line all the time. I hope that somebody who has actually run one will post and let us know how it is arranged.

 #292270  by BR&P
 
Golden Arm, speaking in the context of automobiles, you always disconnect the negative terminal from the battery. Since on an auto (and on small GE locos for that matter) the ground is to the frame, by doing so you have removed the possibility of closing a circuit. Once that negative is off you can touch positive to anything and it won't do a thing. If you disconnect the positive it does essentially the same thing, but in Pablo's case, he was tightening the +. If the neg had been off there would have been no circuit, and if the wrench hit the fender when tightening the negative no problem as it is already ground.

Larger locos have separate wires for positive and negative. When one shorts out and touches something metal it does not necessarily draw an arc because (in theory) there is no ground to the frame. It gets interesting if you happen to get a negative AND a positive wire grounded at the same time, as it is possible to feed currect in strange ways. George Hockaday told of a unit on the Monon which had multiple grounds. They could not shut the loco down as long as the steam generator control circuit was ON, as there was also a ground in one of the governor circuits as well and the gov was fed current through the steam gen.

That's why one of the things you are required to do on a 92-day test on a loco is checking for grounds, both + and -.

 #302504  by tominboise
 
The multi engine switchers are certified wth the EPA using a microprocessor to start and stop the engines, to a rather exotic scheme calculated to reduce the NOx emissions to the lowest possible levels, when tested on the locomotive switch and line haul duty cycles. There are no provisions for the engineer to start all the engines and have them on line, as this would be considered by the EPA as a "defeat device", in other words, you could operate the locomotive outside the control system that it was certified under. This is illegal.

SDL39

 #434043  by uhaul
 
What was the weight limit (in tons per axle) of the trackage the SDL39s were designed to run on?

 #450267  by NHRDC121
 
The SDL39's weighed in at 250,000 lbs for an axle loading of 20.8 tons per axle, which was still within the loading range of the track and bridges of the branches they were intended to be used on, if that's any help.

 #450743  by uhaul
 
Thank you.

 #503397  by uhaul
 
Thank you moving it Otto Vondrak. (I thought it was in the EMD forum in the first place.)

 #504470  by VITO
 
Didnt WC buy some ? I forget who first owned them.Maybe Milwaukee Road.

 #504752  by MEC407
 
What the Wikipedia article doesn't tell you is that CN got rid of the SDL39s after they took over Wisconsin Central.
 Reply
  • 1
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
 Return to “EMD - Electro-Motive (Progress Rail, General Motors)”
 - All times are UTC-05:00 -