Railroad Forums 

  • The Main/Bergen/Port Jervis Line Thread

  • Discussion related to New Jersey Transit rail and light rail operations.
Discussion related to New Jersey Transit rail and light rail operations.

Moderators: lensovet, Kaback9, nick11a

 #1448647  by EuroStar
 
The area around Garfield station is being proposed for redevelopment. Here is a linkhttp://www.northjersey.com/story/news/b ... 803106001/.

If that happens then Garfield station will not get 'Great-notched'. If in fact this happens, the station might become full service. I do not see the point in not having it being full service now anyway -- the few locals that skip it do not really provide fast service anyway, so another minute stopping there is not a big loss, and it could actually improve the ridership.
 #1448774  by CentralValleyRail
 
EuroStar wrote:The area around Garfield station is being proposed for redevelopment. Here is a linkhttp://www.northjersey.com/story/news/b ... 803106001/.

If that happens then Garfield station will not get 'Great-notched'. If in fact this happens, the station might become full service. I do not see the point in not having it being full service now anyway -- the few locals that skip it do not really provide fast service anyway, so another minute stopping there is not a big loss, and it could actually improve the ridership.
The sad part about great notch is when they have some of the Hoboken (MU's) use the Great Notch Stub in theory they could add Great Notch on as a stop at NO additional cost.
 #1449706  by SecaucusJunction
 
Hopefully a new station platform is included in the revitalization of Garfield. It sucks for the people who may have to move their businesses, but the town could really use something to make it more attractive to people.
 #1455609  by NIMBYkiller
 
My apologies if this has been brought up here in the past, but has there ever been a study to see if running time would be reduced if the service went over the old line through downtown Middletown and Chester (Erie route I think?)?
 #1455640  by trainbrain
 
Zero chance of that being restored. It would probably save at least some time, and bring in more ridership, but just wait for nimby outrage from people who haven't had trains running through their backyard for 30 years.
 #1455698  by Roadgeek Adam
 
There's literally no reason for any service on the Old Main at this point. Would downtown stations in Monroe, Goshen, Chester and Middletown be nice? Sure. The Graham Line is much faster and better built.

Now if you want real speculation, you wonder what would've happened if the Graham Line proposal south of Newburgh Junction happened.
 #1455705  by andrewjw
 
Roadgeek Adam wrote:There's literally no reason for any service on the Old Main at this point. Would downtown stations in Monroe, Goshen, Chester and Middletown be nice? Sure. The Graham Line is much faster and better built.

Now if you want real speculation, you wonder what would've happened if the Graham Line proposal south of Newburgh Junction happened.
What proposal is this?
 #1455713  by SemperFidelis
 
Roadgeek Adam wrote:
What proposal is this?
Perhaps this?

https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source= ... IlxGA1X6w-" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

As I can't always get it to load properly:

The proposal speaks of building one or two short connections allowing his NYC, O&W, and the Erie to abandon a few dozen miles of track, many large and expensive trestles, and pool resources in and around Newburgh, NY...all without losing access to any customers. Sort of a microscopic Shared Assets, I guess.

I will rewrite this tomorrow when my eyes aren't crossed.
 #1455714  by NIMBYkiller
 
Seems like, according to the old Erie schedules, that the main was actually faster. Suffern to Port Jervis in 1hr 22min making 11 stops vs today 1hr 26min making 8 stops. Assuming Southfields and Arden would never re-open, you could shave another 2 minutes or so off that Erie schedule. So tell me again about how the Graham is much faster? Considering my generation largely wanting to be in the downtown and largely turning towards a car free lifestyle (some by choice, some by financial force), it sounds like moving passenger service to the Graham was an all around loser
 #1455732  by EuroStar
 
Given that the rails are gone, you are looking at probably $200 million to simply put them back on the right of way (grading, gravel, drainage, PTC included). Then you are looking at about $20 million per ADA compliant station. Add to that everything you will need to pay for to get the NIMBYs quiet: noise walls and fencing, an underpass or an overpass for a road or two per town, some other junk that a local politico wants. Overall say another $150 million. So you are looking at about $350 million for what will not be more than 10,000 extra passengers (and that is generous). I do not see that happening. $350 million compares favorably to $2 billion for the LIRR third track, but is still very expensive for what is a rural area with uncongested roads. The line though the old downtowns is gone and is never coming back. If the MTA wanted to put that amount of money into Orange county, they should just double track to Middletown, pay NJ to put in a middle express track between Suffern and Waldwick and run every train between Suffern and Secaucus express through NJ.
 #1455738  by Roadgeek Adam
 
EuroStar wrote:Given that the rails are gone, you are looking at probably $200 million to simply put them back on the right of way (grading, gravel, drainage, PTC included). Then you are looking at about $20 million per ADA compliant station. Add to that everything you will need to pay for to get the NIMBYs quiet: noise walls and fencing, an underpass or an overpass for a road or two per town, some other junk that a local politico wants. Overall say another $150 million. So you are looking at about $350 million for what will not be more than 10,000 extra passengers (and that is generous). I do not see that happening. $350 million compares favorably to $2 billion for the LIRR third track, but is still very expensive for what is a rural area with uncongested roads. The line though the old downtowns is gone and is never coming back. If the MTA wanted to put that amount of money into Orange county, they should just double track to Middletown, pay NJ to put in a middle express track between Suffern and Waldwick and run every train between Suffern and Secaucus express through NJ.
Even the express would probably stop at Ridgewood.

Anyway, as this map from 1923 shows, there was a proposed grade reduction line from Passaic Junction to Newburgh Junction proposed that would've bypassed the line we know today.
 #1456399  by Graeme Salt
 
Apologies if this has been discussed previously, but I note that for the insomniac/insane rail enthusiast, there is the possibility to do an overnight round trip from Hoboken to Port Jervis, departing just before 1 am and arriving back at the terminal just after 6. I'm curious to know if anyone has done this, and if so how was the experience? Or has anyone travelled on either leg of this early am service?
 #1456498  by CentralValleyRail
 
Graeme Salt wrote:Apologies if this has been discussed previously, but I note that for the insomniac/insane rail enthusiast, there is the possibility to do an overnight round trip from Hoboken to Port Jervis, departing just before 1 am and arriving back at the terminal just after 6. I'm curious to know if anyone has done this, and if so how was the experience? Or has anyone travelled on either leg of this early am service?
The last PJ outbound of the day 12:45 or whatever usually runs with 3 cars and gets a fairly good crowd. I've been on it a few times. Once your in PJ your left out in the cold for a solid 30-35 minutes. Nothing that I know of is open at that hour. Any real reason to do this? As an extreme railfan your not going to see anything as it will be dark as heck, maybe in the summer on the way back but really not worth it.
  • 1
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
  • 14