NH2060 wrote:TRE chief once told DART board members that the fuel consumed by 4 RDCs equal that of one F59 locomotive pulling 4 Bombardier bilevels. If you only needed 1,2, or 3 RDCs to handle the passengers, it was cheaper to run with that many RDCs vs a F59 locomotive pulling less than 4 bilevels. If you needed more than 4 RDCs to handle the passengers, it was cheaper to run with a F59 locomotive and 4 or more bilevels. His point was that 4 RDCs was the point where the change in economy of operations occurred. I'm not that experienced to acknowledge what he stated was true or not, but I will suggest he was more than qualified with both rolling stock to make that statement.dowlingm wrote:I suspect VIA will keep an eye on things in Vermont, but F40PH locomotives and HEP stock would be my guess in order to keep commonality with Ocean stock, at least until the concept is proven. They have ambitions to do some medium distance runs in NS/NB also.+1. I would think the F40s + coaches would be more practical for the Halifax-Moncton/Moncton-Campbellton runs.
What would be better in rural Canada from an operations point of view really depends upon how long the train needs to be.