Suppose we had to choose between ARC and Seven Extension to Secaucus, which of the two would be the best way to meet future travel needs?
Railroad Forums
Better NYC Access
- General discussion of passenger rail systems not otherwise covered in the specific forums in this category, including high speed rail.
Moderators: mtuandrew, gprimr1
neither one, as both are not happening.
If Conductors are in charge, why are they promoted to be Engineer???
Retired Triebfahrzeugführer. I am not a moderator.
Retired Triebfahrzeugführer. I am not a moderator.
DutchRailnut wrote:neither one, as both are not happening.Which makes Gateway more likely to occur...
You could prefer the 7 Extension on the grounds that it's better than nothing, and ARC was worth nothing from the beginning -- a good thing it got no further than it did. And Gateway is going to occur.
The NY subway system will never go interstate, simply not happening and impossible to fund.
If Conductors are in charge, why are they promoted to be Engineer???
Retired Triebfahrzeugführer. I am not a moderator.
Retired Triebfahrzeugführer. I am not a moderator.
The NY subway system will never go interstate, simply not happening and impossible to fund.[/quote]
I do not think that the Seven Extension to Secaucus is impossible to fund.
You could prefer the 7 Extension on the grounds that it's better than nothing, and ARC was worth nothing from the beginning -- a good thing it got no further than it did. And Gateway is going to occur.[/quote]
So what you are saying is that, from worst to best, the order for enhanced trans-hudson capacity goes: Access to the Region's Core, Seven Subway Extension to Secaucus, New Jersey, Gateway?
I do not think that the Seven Extension to Secaucus is impossible to fund.
You could prefer the 7 Extension on the grounds that it's better than nothing, and ARC was worth nothing from the beginning -- a good thing it got no further than it did. And Gateway is going to occur.[/quote]
So what you are saying is that, from worst to best, the order for enhanced trans-hudson capacity goes: Access to the Region's Core, Seven Subway Extension to Secaucus, New Jersey, Gateway?
no you are saying that I am saying things, I said the two choices you gave are having zero chance at all...
If Conductors are in charge, why are they promoted to be Engineer???
Retired Triebfahrzeugführer. I am not a moderator.
Retired Triebfahrzeugführer. I am not a moderator.
Right. ARC and 7 Extension are tied for zero, leaving Gateway the sole survivor.
I don't mean to come across as dismissive or anything, but there is no chance of getting the 7 train into NJ
Theres no money and WHY? Why would you need expansion? You have a mix of NJTransit and PATH and you can connect to buses
As a regular 7 train commuter i never saw any use for expansion to NJ-Javits is useful because i can get to the NYAS quick but why NJ? You might as well build a separate subway line-it puts extra miles on the subway cars and i will literally scream if i see PANYNJ stickers on 7 trains
. The 7 train in my pinion is built for one use only: to connect commuters in Flushing and woodside and long island city to major manhattan transport hubs-not as another way for new jersians and new yorkers to cross borders. Use existing infrastructure
Theres no money and WHY? Why would you need expansion? You have a mix of NJTransit and PATH and you can connect to buses
As a regular 7 train commuter i never saw any use for expansion to NJ-Javits is useful because i can get to the NYAS quick but why NJ? You might as well build a separate subway line-it puts extra miles on the subway cars and i will literally scream if i see PANYNJ stickers on 7 trains
. The 7 train in my pinion is built for one use only: to connect commuters in Flushing and woodside and long island city to major manhattan transport hubs-not as another way for new jersians and new yorkers to cross borders. Use existing infrastructureMTA project completion date calculator Take the MTA 's estimate for completion and add 8 years to that.
I agree with Dutch, neither would best meet future travel needs. None of the above is the right answer.
"To cure the British disease with socialism was like trying to cure leukaemia with leeches." Margaret Thatcher
Moderator's Note: Discussed ad nauseum elsewhere - locked here.