What is the difference between conventional & HST coaches, and would the HST\XPT powercars be able to pull conventional equipment of the type Australia uses on it's luxury trains? Also, would you consider the HST a DMU, or a locomotive? Wiki says BR treated them like DMU's, but I'm not sure that's at all correct...
Wikipedia: British Rail Mark 3 wrote:The main difference between the HST vehicles and the loco-hauled Mark 3A relate to electrical supply arrangements. HST MK3 coaches take an industrial voltage/frequency 3-phase supply directly from an auxiliary alternator in the power car to supply on-board equipment such as air conditioning. The loco-hauled vehicles take a standard single-phase 1000 V AC or DC train heat supply from the locomotive and convert it through motor generator units located under the floor. These convert the train supply to 3-phase 415/240 V 50 Hz AC to power air conditioning and other ancillaries. This difference makes the two types non-interconnectable in service conditions. The other main difference is the lack of buffers on HST coaches.Instead of the Mark 3 coach used in Britain, the XPT uses a variant of a Budd stainless steel coach. I can't recall the reasons Australia had for doing so, but if I squint, it looks like a string of Silverliner IIs or IIIs sandwiched between each power car. I like it!