obienick wrote:F-line to Dudley via Park wrote:Komarovsky wrote:All of the stations west of Framingham have large parking lots that usually aren't even close to full, so I doubt parking would be too big of a problem. Dwell at each station might be an issue though, since only Worcester has a full high level platform.
Not much longer if the T wants to act on it. After Beacon Park closes all east-of-Framingham stations cease being on a freight clearance route. Yawkey is being raised. Back Bay and West Natick can be raised. And the other 7 are non-ADA anyway, with the 3 in Newton needing full rebuilds so they're accessible from both tracks. It would be an expensive proposition, but all of them could be raised...and at least 7 out of 10 are high-priority raises because of the ADA situation. If they wanted to, they could.
Framingham, too. They really should drop a freight passing track behind the station so CSX doesn't have to crawl through the platform when it's heading out to Everett or Walpole. And Amtrak will probably want highs for the resumption of Inland Regionals.
Theoretically, they could reduce the entire line to just 4 mini-highs on the freight clearance route and go full-high everywhere else. And use the automatic door coaches on Framingham short-turns. Either way an ADA backlog that staggering is going to require a lot more of them than they've got now.
There will still be freight traffic and as such they will have to keep it open for extradimentional loads. With the drop in traffic, there's no reason why one track can be upgraded (solid cement platform edges) and the other can fit these dimensions (foam breakaways & collapsable platform edges).
Not east of Framingham. That freight traffic drops to just the daily produce train round-trip to Everett after Beacon Park closes. Produce train not having any wide loads. And there are rumors CSX might be willing to sell that run to Pan Am and get off the northside and east-of-Framingham entirely, if somebody makes it worth their while.
Grafton, Westborough, Southborough, and Ashland of course remain on the clearance route and can only be mini-highs unless modified with a passing track. Framingham too, unless they want to drop in the passing track behind the station (there's certainly room for it:
http://goo.gl/maps/jSfwk). But they won't even be able to get wides to port of Southie after the Yawkey work is finished (not that they need to at what's going to be a primarily container port), and if they don't see value in seeking new wide-load business in Everett then there's no reason anything east of Framingham can't go high. Worcester-Framingham + Framingham-Walpole + Walpole-Readville / Walpole-Mansfield-Attleboro-Middleboro are the wide clearance routes from here on out. That means the 4 outer intermediate stations on the Worcester Line...Plimptonville (such that it is), Windsor Gardens, Norwood Central, Norwood Depot, Islington, Dedham Corporate, and Endicott on the Franklin (but not Walpole, where the freights miss the platform), and Foxboro on the Framingham Secondary are the only "mandated" mini-highs on the southside that don't have better passing options in the cards. Everything else can...or will (such as NEC re: Amtrak's requirements) go high.