Railroad Forums 

  • DL109 and PA Branch Restrictions?

  • Discussion relating to the NH and its subsidiaries (NYW&B, Union Freight Railroad, Connecticut Company, steamship lines, etc.). up until its 1969 inclusion into the Penn Central merger. This forum is also for the discussion of efforts to preserve former New Haven equipment, artifacts and its history. You may also wish to visit www.nhrhta.org for more information.
Discussion relating to the NH and its subsidiaries (NYW&B, Union Freight Railroad, Connecticut Company, steamship lines, etc.). up until its 1969 inclusion into the Penn Central merger. This forum is also for the discussion of efforts to preserve former New Haven equipment, artifacts and its history. You may also wish to visit www.nhrhta.org for more information.
 #1452182  by Statkowski
 
Engine type restrictions were listed in the Time Table in Rule 1710 (according to the April 29, 1951 issue).

For PA-1s and DL-109s any restrictions would have been on lightly-used branches with no passenger service. Also, any restrictions would be due to the engine's weight, not its length or wheelbase. A DL-109 could handle a curve as severe as 21° (274.37 ft or 83.63 m).

New Haven/Hartford Division restrictions were as follows:
Branchville and Ridgefield - DERS-3
Canaan and Lakeville - DERS-3
Highland Jct. and Watertown - DERS-3
Vernon-Ellington and Rockville - DERS-3
Farmington and New Hartford - DERS-3
Northampton and Williamsburgh - DERS-3

Boston/Providence Division restrictions were as follows:
Providence and Bristol - DER-2
Westdale and East Bridgewater - DERS-3
Tremont and Fairhaven - DERS-3
New Bedford and Watuppa - DERS-3
Franklin Jct. and Hopkinton - DERS-3

Note - The DERS-3 was the Raymond Loewy-styled FM H-16-44 (0790 series). The DER-2 was the Alco FA-1 (0400 series).