jfrey40535 wrote:What about using the line as a means for people to reach destinations like New York or Harrisburg without going to Center City or Trenton, or is that market not big enough to justify the cost?I think that commute market, in particular the Bucks and Montgomery county residents commuting to NYC, as well as the potential use as a P&R line delivering commuters from Bucks, Chester, and Montgomery counties to the King of Prussia office developments should be the primary thrust of any CCM plan. We don't expect everyone to be able to walk to the other Regional Rail lines, so I'm confused as to why the standard appears to be different for CCM. Of course it's unlikely that commuters travelling suburb to suburb will use CCM to reach somewhere like Plymouth Meeting, but folks without cars or those unusually fed up with traffic would probably welcome a shuttle as a godsend.
IMHO it really comes down to King of Prussia, as it would be imperative that the line come closer to both the mall and the office developments than the former PRR line does, and it should pass through Norristown as to provide a transfer and track connection to the R6 and whatever SVM ends up being. This would presumably mean that an elevated line would have to be built between the Trenton cutoff just west of the I-76 bridge and the NS Reading line somewhere around Port Kennedy. Now, if SEPTA can ever get the Rt100 King of Prussia extension off the drawing boards this el could easily be built with the Rt100 down the middle and provisions for the CCM and perhaps even an SVM spur or route from Center City direct to the KOP mall to be added outside those tracks. That probably would be the single most expensive component of any Cross County Metro project, and once that essential lynchpin was complete it'd be fairly straightforward and fairly affordable to expand the double tracking, add some sidings, string the wire, build stations and place park and rides and start service.