Railroad Forums 

Discussion relating to the operations of MTA MetroNorth Railroad including west of Hudson operations and discussion of CtDOT sponsored rail operations such as Shore Line East and the Springfield to New Haven Hartford Line

Moderators: GirlOnTheTrain, nomis, FL9AC, Jeff Smith

 #1535135  by DutchRailnut
 
Guess you forgot that New Haven law firm who does not care if it has to confiscate trains :-)
They impounded a Metro North and Amtrak locomotive at time of departure :-)

http://www.trainlaw.com/Additional-Info ... eist.shtml
 #1535142  by nomis
 
The MBB lease is a 3 year lease, signed on Dec. 8, 2017, with options for an additional 3 years - up to 6 years total.
 #1535178  by njtmnrrbuff
 
I think we will likely see these MBB cars for another three more years. Something needs to cover the Ctrail Hartford Line trains. Amtrak has very little capacity to expand the 400 serious shuttle trains on the SPG Line. One solution that might be something to think about is if the MBB cars have to go back is that maybe CDOT could look into borrowing the MBTA Bombardier cars after more new bilevels enter revenue service on MBTA.
 #1535192  by EuroStar
 
NH2060 wrote: Thu Feb 27, 2020 3:42 pm Perhaps the RFI could be used as leverage in getting an extension on the MBB lease if there are no spare cars to be found anywhere? (“We looked and there’s nothing available and we can’t replace the trains with buses!”)
That is actually a great point. Given that the Hartford Line actually ends in Massachusetts and serves its largest city on the west, the incentive to actually recall the cars is certainly not as strong.
nomis wrote: Thu Feb 27, 2020 8:10 pm The MBB lease is a 3 year lease, signed on Dec. 8, 2017, with options for an additional 3 years - up to 6 years total.
That is good to know. Hopefully the option is only conditioned on the will of the lessee, not also on the lessor.
 #1535392  by njtmnrrbuff
 
Not that I'm a big fan of the MBB cars, Ctrail Hartford Line passengers will probably still need those cars until enough of the newer equipment is good enough to enter revenue service. Constantly randomly having to cancel trains because of equipment shortages won't go well with passengers. That's why the brand new equipment should have been ordered a few years ago, before the brand name changed to Ctrail. I have experienced that too many times here in New Jersey Transit land.