jaymac wrote: BostonUrbEx » Sat Oct 27, 2012 9:09 pm
...if we ever want the E to run to Arborway again, we should face facts that street running stops are going to have to be few and far between.
To establish my creds as someone with some knowledge of the area, I grew up on Moraine Street, where South Huntington and Boylston end and Centre does a slight dog-leg. Additionally, I went to school at both the Curley and Agassiz before going to Latin.
Once the Arborway route gets beyond South Huntington, the width of the street becomes more constricted, and more and more businesses and their attendant vehicular traffic populate Centre and South Streets. In the last years of steel-wheel service on Centre between the previously mentioned five-way intersection and the Monument and then further on South Street towards the Arborway, double-parking had already had an impact on timely running. Buses do have a maneuverability advantage over streetcars and can get around double-parked vehicles. Additionally, rail and/or wire maintenance effectively would shut down a portion of Centre and South, not winning the T any friends in either the provider or consumer communities. The less rail and overhead there is to maintain, the less costs there are in crews, materials, equipment, and ill will. Just rehabbing rail and wire beyond Heath to reactivate Arborway streetcar service would be its own miniversion of The Big Dig, Part Deux.
The T may currently be in reactive mode about cars going bump in the day at Brigham, but I wouldn't be surprised if it's not already back in anticipatory planning when it comes to liability. Revisiting the maneuverability-of-buses factor, a bus can and will pull to curb- or parked-vehicle-side to pick up or discharge passengers. A streetcar cannot. Impatient drivers can and do pass street-running streetcars on the right, to the hazard of embarkers and debarkers along the outer stretch of Huntington and end of South Huntington. The island-running stretch of Huntington does have increased safety.
Am I glad I grew up with street-running? Absolutely. Do I think returning to it beyond Brigham, even with fewer stops, is a good idea? Absolutely not.
I would have to agree with you, although I think you meant to say "returning it beyond Heath" rather than "Brigham" (since it currently DOES serve beyond Brigham). Just because street running made sense at the time it started doesn't mean it would make sense today. As you mentioned, the streets are very narrow through JP center. I've driven on them and let me tell you that with all the motorists and foot traffic it isn't the easiest street to navigate, especially at high speeds, and especially if I had to drive on a set path like a trolley. Also, I'd bet that the number of cars has increased significantly since the Arborway portion was eliminated from the E, and no, not as a direct effect. But because population increases, gentrification, etc. More vehicles means more congestion and more difficulty for a trolley to
efficiently serve its passengers. This would only be worse today than it was in 1985. Remember that public transit should be efficient, not just convenient. Sure, a one-ride trip into Lechmere from JP Monument would be nice, but with street running would it really be efficient? Also, we have more advanced technology today like higher-capacity, articulated, kneeling buses, which we did not have in 1985, at least to my knowledge. My final argument is that, if you subscribe to T Alerts or follow @mbtagm on twitter, you know how often the E turns around at Brigham Circle due to an "automobile accident" on Huntington or South Huntington. If the E were extended back to Arborway, the number of these "Automobile accidents" disrupting service would be huge. So, while I don't agree with the way the MBTA eliminated service, and I am a supporter of subways and trains and public transit, I have to admit that street running past Heath seems just plain stupid. I think we as railfans need to separate our biases ("love for trains"), our emotions (angry at the T) and what actually makes sense given the logistics of street running in today's environment. Oh, and I did not even get into accessibility. But this is just my opinion of course!