Fitchburg line: why single track through Waltham?

Discussion relating to commuter rail, light rail, and subway operations of the MBTA.

Moderators: CRail, sery2831

User avatar
Yellowspoon
Posts: 223
Joined: Wed Jun 14, 2006 1:00 pm

Fitchburg line: why single track through Waltham?

Post by Yellowspoon » Wed Jun 15, 2016 9:41 am

My daughter moved to Watertown which causes me to pass through Waltham to get to her apartment. I noticed that there is a single track through Waltham center. When I cross the tracks at Roberts, it's double tracked. In looking at Wikimapia, it appears to be single tracked for about 3/4 mile. I feel pretty sure that there were two tracks when I was a teenager 50 years ago. Why (and when) was one track removed. Doesn't that create a scheduling headache should there be a delay somewhere along the line? Is this the only place it's single tracked?

TomNelligan
Posts: 3329
Joined: Fri Mar 12, 2004 5:43 pm
Location: Massachusetts

Re: Fitchburg line: why single track through Waltham?

Post by TomNelligan » Wed Jun 15, 2016 10:16 am

The single track through Waltham dates back fifty years or thereabouts, to the late 1950s or early 1960s. When the Boston & Maine started handling piggyback traffic on Fitchburg Division freights there was a clearance issue at one or two of the highway bridges over the rock cut east of the station. The solution at the time was to remove the second track and run the remaining single track on the center of the right-of-way through the constricted area. And yes, this has been a bottleneck ever since.

User avatar
BandA
Posts: 2859
Joined: Thu Oct 11, 2012 11:47 am

Re: Fitchburg line: why single track through Waltham?

Post by BandA » Wed Jun 15, 2016 11:16 am

Are they engineering a solution? My understanding from prior discussions is 1)Where to put the station platforms 2)All trains stop at Waltham so it has been a lower priority up till now. 3)Technically still a clearance route so double-stack or wide freight could theoretically happen 4)Would also be nice to grade separate at the same time but that is next to impossible due to the Charles River and width of the ROW.

F-line to Dudley via Park
Posts: 7355
Joined: Fri Mar 11, 2005 7:26 pm
Location: North Cambridge

Re: Fitchburg line: why single track through Waltham?

Post by F-line to Dudley via Park » Wed Jun 15, 2016 11:51 am

1) Probably would work best adding the inbound platform west of Moody St. crossing opposite the current platform, since that's the only place you can put a full-length platform and have trains not foul the Moody and Elm crossings at the same time. The current midblock platform is just too awkwardly short and would have to go. Would entail switching the angled parking to parallel parking, shifting the current platform back where the switch currently is so the DT can be extended, installing the other side platform abutting the Biagio Ristorante parking lot with back egresses onto the Charles River Greenway. Only tricky part is getting permission from Biagio's to have the platform egresses so close to their property. Any parking loss can easily be compensated when the midblock platform is abandoned; they can buff it out with a few more spaces of extra width.

2) Yep. And one of the main low-motivation points is that the decrepit Jackson and Newton St. overpasses need replacement. Kind of pointless to lay DT if MassDOT is eventually going to be on the ground doing lots of side abutment work for the replacements. Easier to wait till after they're done. It's also an ADA mini-high station, so they've got bigger fish to fry getting one or both of the non-accessible Belmont stops up to compliance first. All in due time.

3) No. Lowell is the clearance route that can do 17' tall, wide-load Plate F cars, and thus the only route PAR uses into Boston unless it's got a service disruption to work around (in which case Reading is #2). There is no freight whatsoever on the Fitchburg Line inbound of Willows, and hasn't been since the now-closed Ocean Spray plant in Littleton ended rail deliveries. Nothing's reached inbound of Littleton since the last Watertown Branch delivery almost 10 years ago. All Boston jobs originate out of Lawrence, not Ayer, so unless there's a reshuffle to some Ayer-Boston routings inner Fitchburg's strictly a tertiary backup route at this point. Even if it did see "a" freight job or two reshuffled to Ayer, you're talking very small rinky-dink stuff like Everett and Peabody. The biggest Boston-area job, PAR's DOBO to Boston Sand & Gravel, is forever captive to the Lowell Line because it originates in Dover, NH.

4) Correct. Not possible to trench because of the Charles, not possible to bridge because of the Jackson and Newton overpasses not allowing enough running room. Best they can do probably is grouping both platforms west of Moody so Elm stays un-fouled during train stops, optimizing the traffic signaling to dump the car queues quickly after a train, and maybe tarting up the alley between Moody and Elm a block south of the station as a quasi- River St. Extension to offer a cross-block load-bearing match to Carter St. on the other side of the tracks. There's definitely slack space today in that sub-optimal downtown street grid to tighten up the bolts beneficially. In no way is Waltham Ctr. the irredeemable dumpster fire that is downtown Framingham abutting those Worcester Line crossings. Waltham has good room for improvement with inexpensive finesse touches if they pick their spots carefully.

User avatar
BandA
Posts: 2859
Joined: Thu Oct 11, 2012 11:47 am

Re: Fitchburg line: why single track through Waltham?

Post by BandA » Thu Jun 16, 2016 12:14 am

F-line to Dudley via Park wrote: In no way is Waltham Ctr. the irredeemable dumpster fire that is downtown Framingham abutting those Worcester Line crossings. Waltham has good room for improvement with inexpensive finesse touches if they pick their spots carefully.
Big difference was Moody/Lexington St. was bypassed sixty years ago when they moved 128. 126 was never bypassed (and there is no passenger service on the north-south branches through Framingham or Natick...hmmm)

Irredeemable dumpster fire - hilarious!

newpylong
Posts: 4289
Joined: Thu Jun 28, 2007 12:32 pm
Location: NH

Re: Fitchburg line: why single track through Waltham?

Post by newpylong » Thu Jun 16, 2016 2:42 pm

There have been numerous freight detours over the Fitchburg in the past 10 years but nothing of Plate F.

CRail
Posts: 2381
Joined: Tue May 18, 2004 8:27 am
Location: Eastie

Re: Fitchburg line: why single track through Waltham?

Post by CRail » Mon Jun 20, 2016 1:28 pm

Moderator: Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority
Avatar:3679A (since wrecked)/3623B (now in service as 3636B).

theseaandalifesaver
Posts: 770
Joined: Tue Mar 14, 2006 9:34 pm
Location: Seattle, WA

Re: Fitchburg line: why single track through Waltham?

Post by theseaandalifesaver » Fri Apr 13, 2018 3:54 pm

When was the switch removed for the Watertown Branch?

TomNelligan
Posts: 3329
Joined: Fri Mar 12, 2004 5:43 pm
Location: Massachusetts

Re: Fitchburg line: why single track through Waltham?

Post by TomNelligan » Fri Apr 13, 2018 8:37 pm

theseaandalifesaver wrote:When was the switch removed for the Watertown Branch?
I can't give you an exact date, but it's been a few years now. After the rest of the branch was abandoned, a short stub remained behind the tower for quite a while. It was used as a pull-off for maintenance equipment, but then it got torn up too.

tvon
Posts: 26
Joined: Thu Mar 15, 2007 1:49 pm
Location: A Line

Re: Fitchburg line: why single track through Waltham?

Post by tvon » Sun Jun 02, 2019 10:56 pm

Sorry to bump an old post.. but I work adjacent to the fitchburg/wachusett line.. I occasionally see some freight engines come down the line with one or two boxcars attached. No markings other than some "GATX.." on the box cars (which probably doesnt say much). Sorry for the noobie question, but always wondered where they were headed and why! Thx in advance.

railfaning boston
Posts: 3
Joined: Mon Aug 19, 2019 4:23 pm
Location: West Somerville, MA

Re: Fitchburg line: why single track through Waltham?

Post by railfaning boston » Wed Aug 21, 2019 4:43 pm

tvon wrote:
Sun Jun 02, 2019 10:56 pm
Sorry to bump an old post.. but I work adjacent to the fitchburg/wachusett line.. I occasionally see some freight engines come down the line with one or two boxcars attached. No markings other than some "GATX.." on the box cars (which probably doesnt say much). Sorry for the noobie question, but always wondered where they were headed and why! Thx in advance.
had the same question

jonnhrr
Posts: 1190
Joined: Sun May 30, 2004 5:58 pm
Location: Sabattus ME USA

Re: Fitchburg line: why single track through Waltham?

Post by jonnhrr » Thu Aug 22, 2019 12:18 pm

You might want to ask this question on the Pan Am forum as there are people there knowledgeable about PAR freight operations.
Avatar Photo - P&W local from Gardner to Worcester at Morgan Rd., Hubbardston

GP40MC1118
Posts: 3647
Joined: Thu Mar 11, 2004 8:06 pm

Re: Fitchburg line: why single track through Waltham?

Post by GP40MC1118 » Thu Aug 22, 2019 5:46 pm

GATX is a leasing company...locomotives and cars like this boxcar. It's probably
an empty headed back to Maine.

D

PT1101
Posts: 117
Joined: Mon Jun 26, 2006 4:04 pm

Re: Fitchburg line: why single track through Waltham?

Post by PT1101 » Sat Aug 24, 2019 8:20 am

The locomotives you see with the large GATX on the nose are units being leased by Keolis. I believe they have GMTX reporting marks. I'd have to check, but I recall seeing one numbered around 2622 in work train service. I don't think they have more than 4 on lease. They are used for switching, work train, and rescue service when a revenue train experiences locomotive issues.

GP40MC1118
Posts: 3647
Joined: Thu Mar 11, 2004 8:06 pm

Re: Fitchburg line: why single track through Waltham?

Post by GP40MC1118 » Sun Aug 25, 2019 5:32 pm

There's four of them - 2608, 2622, 2635 & 2636.

A fifth one, the 2208 (off lease from the VTR) was set out at Walpole, reportedly
for Keolis.

D

Return to “Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority (MBTA)”