Article on T snow strategies:
http://www.bostonglobe.com/metro/2015/0 ... l#comments:
http://www.bostonglobe.com/metro/2015/0 ... l#comments:
Railroad Forums
The EGE wrote:Apparently the Globe isn't capable of looking up that the T doesn't have a substantial stock of non-revenue equipment, and has not for some time.The red line has (had?) a diesel plow that spent the whole winter rusting on a siding. Stop making excuses for the T.
The EGE wrote:There's a big difference between a very small amount of work equipment workable for clearing snow, and having multiple trainsets of non-revenue equipment to run to keep the line clear. The Red Line has a flat car with plow (built in 1928 by BERy!), four OOS 1400 series work cars, two snowblowers, and one diesel (not sure if functional) for the whole line and the AMHSL. The Orange Line has a single snowblower. The Green Line has six lead sleds that need revenue units to be pushed. The Blue Line has nothing.It's just this awful chicken/egg situation from people I know who work there. The T underperforms/the state underfunds, and the state gets fed up with paying/the workers and management check out, and this cycle keeps perpetuating itself. One look at the difference between the MTA and the MBTA in terms of what they have for snow removal (the MTA: nearly a dozen diesel-powered rotary plows, double-ended on diesel-powered work cars, with 3rd rail brushes and everything, the MBTA: one rusted snowblower and the revenue fleet, now take a guess at which one is mostly tunnels and el's where snow removal isn't an issue, and which one runs at ground level for the majority of its route length?) is enough to see how bad it's gotten.
The Globe, however, did not look this up. They made it look as though the T simply forgot to run what they had.
To my knowledge, MTA, PATH, and WMATA all keep a substantial number of functional ex-revenue cars operational. SEPTA and CTA run almost entirely on elevateds or in tunnel; the SEPTA trolleys are all street-running, though I'm not sure what the NHSL uses. I'm not sure what is used in Cleveland, St. Louis, Baltimore, or Minneapolis. The T definitely seems to be the outlier.
My point being: the T is politically forced to run revenue equipment without replacement until it is no longer usable even as work equipment, nor is yard space available to hold ex-revenue equipment for snow-clearing use. That is long-term, capital-intensive, and politically determined change that must be made, and it's the fault of neglect and financial malevolence at the state level as well as internal problems.
The EGE wrote:There's a big difference between a very small amount of work equipment workable for clearing snow, and having multiple trainsets of non-revenue equipment to run to keep the line clear. The Red Line has a flat car with plow (built in 1928 by BERy!), four OOS 1400 series work cars, two snowblowers, and one diesel (not sure if functional) for the whole line and the AMHSL. The Orange Line has a single snowblower. The Green Line has six lead sleds that need revenue units to be pushed. The Blue Line has nothing.In terms of the diesel work equipment, it appears they DID forget to run what they had, or otherwise decided not to. In fact, one might suspect that they hadn't even bothered to maintain the stuff for years on end. That this hasn't hit the news yet (to my knowledge) is astonishing to me.
The Globe, however, did not look this up. They made it look as though the T simply forgot to run what they had.
Rbts Stn wrote:Someone call me when there's cash allocated to purchase all this new snow removal and maintenance equipment.Cheaper than burning out traction motors and hiring union workers to hand-shovel miles of ROW
Then call me again when it's cleared to operate on the system.
I put the over/under at 2022, unless the Olympics don't come to Boston, in which case I put the over/under at a Zager and Evans esque 2525.