Railroad Forums 

  • Retirements and Disposition of CR Equipment

  • Discussion relating to commuter rail, light rail, and subway operations of the MBTA.
Discussion relating to commuter rail, light rail, and subway operations of the MBTA.

Moderators: sery2831, CRail

 #1361252  by F-line to Dudley via Park
 
ST214 wrote:The ideal thing that would have also been cheaper to do is rebuild them again and put them back in service.

For those of us that miss the screamers, at least there is he G&U polar express. Although 1013 will not be cruising by at 59, she will be happily screaming as EMD intended her to do.

On another note, I had a dream awhile back where I won around 400 million dollars.I also must add this dream happened before 1016 met her fate. I purchased a rail line and then purchased ALL the screamers, along with six coaches. I then set up a excursion train where people that like screamers like I do can see hem run every day. Oh, and I still had around 300 million left, enough to finance the operation for a LONG time.

Oh well, back to reality.
The economics of rebuilding a Screamer aren't what they were 10 years ago. The ones that are still kicking around rebuilt like Metro North's west-of-Hudson fleet were plucked from Amtrak dispersals back when the aftermarket for commuter rail power was nearly barren of anything built after the Eisenhower administration. So spending the bucks to physically modify the carbody steelwork to cram in the HEP generator and get it upgraded to -2Cxx spec was a great deal in the mid/late-90's. And once it had the HEP generator further rebuilds to -3C generation during the 'aughts and 2010's was pretty much rote-standard work.

Today there's a glut of aftermarket power with generators--2nd-gen F40's, F59PH's, various assorted Geeps, P40DC's--that keeps getting replenished in bursts. It no longer makes dollars and sense for a commuter rail operator to scour for original Screamers when rebuilding comes with a modest cost premium of installing a HEP generator and working a blowtorch on the carbody to rig up the mounting space. It costs too much less to do a vanilla rebuild on something that had the generator from Day 1, or had the generator installed in a previous rebuild. Throw in the fact that even something as all-world solid as a Screamer is going to start to show early signs of metal fatigue after 35 years of punishment in all-day service, and timeframe between necessary rebuild cycles is going to be much shorter and hit up the operator doing the rebuild for $$$ more often than if they picked something a little newer to overhaul.

Add all those factors together and the economics of a rebuild for long-term continued service as somebody's mainstay commuter rail fleet just doesn't wash. The T hemmed and hawed on that very question with all the maybe-yes/maybe-no rumors that have come and gone about what the options were for these units. I'm sure they crunched the numbers themselves, and it just didn't look too hot in the end. Since there's no shortage of aftermarket parts it's entirely probable that most of these units will live on in limited service with the excursion carriers willing to give them some TLC, and maybe make some appearances on the leaser circuit if the rent-a-wreck brokers are sitting on enough of a parts cache to get them in "it runs; take it or leave it" shape for a couple years prior to the excursion carriers snapping them up. But that's it. I mean, we're maybe 3 years away from 20 Amtrak F59PHI's coming available for re-sale since Amtrak California has already drained their Siemens Charger replacement options...Caltrain's electrification dispensing with their 20+ F40PH-2C's in 5-7 years...and possibly a motherlode of 200+ P42DC's and P40DC's in 4-5 years if Amtrak takes the national options on the Charger. Then everyone else who plunks down for all-new Tier 4-compliant makes. It's just too much of an oversupply of 1980's and 1990's power about to flood the secondhand market for 1978's state-of-the-art to price out favorably for another overhaul.



That said...the -2C's and PHM-2C's are most definitely rebuildable if the T wanted to go that route. They probably won't for the (cross-fingers it isn't years late) 2020 procurement because they've simply outgrown 3000 HP locos, but those things are definitely going to be running for somebody for 2 more decades. Some of the latest -3C rebuilds are even kosher for the new emissions regs (in the tiers covering 'remanufacture').
 #1361562  by ST214
 
F-line to Dudley via Park wrote:
ST214 wrote:The ideal thing that would have also been cheaper to do is rebuild them again and put them back in service.

For those of us that miss the screamers, at least there is he G&U polar express. Although 1013 will not be cruising by at 59, she will be happily screaming as EMD intended her to do.

On another note, I had a dream awhile back where I won around 400 million dollars.I also must add this dream happened before 1016 met her fate. I purchased a rail line and then purchased ALL the screamers, along with six coaches. I then set up a excursion train where people that like screamers like I do can see hem run every day. Oh, and I still had around 300 million left, enough to finance the operation for a LONG time.

Oh well, back to reality.
The economics of rebuilding a Screamer aren't what they were 10 years ago. The ones that are still kicking around rebuilt like Metro North's west-of-Hudson fleet were plucked from Amtrak dispersals back when the aftermarket for commuter rail power was nearly barren of anything built after the Eisenhower administration. So spending the bucks to physically modify the carbody steelwork to cram in the HEP generator and get it upgraded to -2Cxx spec was a great deal in the mid/late-90's. And once it had the HEP generator further rebuilds to -3C generation during the 'aughts and 2010's was pretty much rote-standard work.

Today there's a glut of aftermarket power with generators--2nd-gen F40's, F59PH's, various assorted Geeps, P40DC's--that keeps getting replenished in bursts. It no longer makes dollars and sense for a commuter rail operator to scour for original Screamers when rebuilding comes with a modest cost premium of installing a HEP generator and working a blowtorch on the carbody to rig up the mounting space. It costs too much less to do a vanilla rebuild on something that had the generator from Day 1, or had the generator installed in a previous rebuild. Throw in the fact that even something as all-world solid as a Screamer is going to start to show early signs of metal fatigue after 35 years of punishment in all-day service, and timeframe between necessary rebuild cycles is going to be much shorter and hit up the operator doing the rebuild for $$$ more often than if they picked something a little newer to overhaul.

Add all those factors together and the economics of a rebuild for long-term continued service as somebody's mainstay commuter rail fleet just doesn't wash. The T hemmed and hawed on that very question with all the maybe-yes/maybe-no rumors that have come and gone about what the options were for these units. I'm sure they crunched the numbers themselves, and it just didn't look too hot in the end. Since there's no shortage of aftermarket parts it's entirely probable that most of these units will live on in limited service with the excursion carriers willing to give them some TLC, and maybe make some appearances on the leaser circuit if the rent-a-wreck brokers are sitting on enough of a parts cache to get them in "it runs; take it or leave it" shape for a couple years prior to the excursion carriers snapping them up. But that's it. I mean, we're maybe 3 years away from 20 Amtrak F59PHI's coming available for re-sale since Amtrak California has already drained their Siemens Charger replacement options...Caltrain's electrification dispensing with their 20+ F40PH-2C's in 5-7 years...and possibly a motherlode of 200+ P42DC's and P40DC's in 4-5 years if Amtrak takes the national options on the Charger. Then everyone else who plunks down for all-new Tier 4-compliant makes. It's just too much of an oversupply of 1980's and 1990's power about to flood the secondhand market for 1978's state-of-the-art to price out favorably for another overhaul.



That said...the -2C's and PHM-2C's are most definitely rebuildable if the T wanted to go that route. They probably won't for the (cross-fingers it isn't years late) 2020 procurement because they've simply outgrown 3000 HP locos, but those things are definitely going to be running for somebody for 2 more decades. Some of the latest -3C rebuilds are even kosher for the new emissions regs (in the tiers covering 'remanufacture').
I was thinking just a rebuild like Metra without a separate HEP generator installed, but I understand the challenges involved with what are at this point(1000-1012) almost 38 year old locomotives. I am just not ready to let go of them yet.
 #1362847  by F-line to Dudley via Park
 
Martin Baumann wrote:Is 1013 still MBTA property or do G&U own it now?
All of the Screamers and all of the MBB's are still MBTA property. This set is on loan.

Until disposition bids go out they remain on the roster as stored equipment. Usually no decisions are made on that for the first year post-retirement (up to several years if you're Amtrak).
 #1365254  by nomis
 
Expect the 1013 and the string of cars to leave Grafton tomorrow ...
 #1365587  by Rbts Stn
 
nomis wrote:Expect the 1013 and the string of cars to leave Grafton tomorrow ...
Is that what I saw being pulled by a work engine on Saturday in Beacon Park just before noon?
 #1365818  by Slushbucket
 
F-line to Dudley via Park wrote:Whoa...+4 MBB trailers and +1 MBB cabs have been yanked out of Seaview and re-entered service. What brought that on?
Perhaps they are subbing for the flats damaged in the Andover/Lawrence derailment?
  • 1
  • 42
  • 43
  • 44
  • 45
  • 46
  • 60