Railroad Forums 

  • Metro wants study on a M Street subway tunnel

  • Discussion related to DC area passenger rail services from Northern Virginia to Baltimore, MD. Includes Light Rail and Baltimore Subway.
Discussion related to DC area passenger rail services from Northern Virginia to Baltimore, MD. Includes Light Rail and Baltimore Subway.

Moderators: mtuandrew, therock, Robert Paniagua

 #1458370  by MCL1981
 
scratchy wrote:as it stands, the state wants to pour more money on double decking !270, which will cost way more than adding a third track to the Met.
Adding a third track to the met doesn't get people anywhere but Silver Spring and Washington. It does nothing for the huge amount of vehicle traffic going everywhere else. The highway needs to be much wider with many more lanes. And no amount of additional rail capacity to DC is going to change that need.
 #1458445  by scratchy
 
Sand Box John wrote:"scratchy"
Most of the NEC was 4 track, up to Landover. When they built some of the platforms in the 80s, they never expected that the 4 track capacity would be needed again, and thus,need to rip them out.


I'm afraid you have it wrong. The Pennsylvania Railroad built the right of way between Lanvale Street in Baltimore and the Landover interlocking to accommodate a future 4th track. A short segment south of Lanvale Street had the 4th track installed during electrification in the 1930s, that segments was extended to Halethorp at a later date. The entire length between Lanvale Street and Landover has never been mostly 4 track. At several of the MARC and Amtrak stations the 3 tracks from the 1930 footprint were realigned to accommodate station platforms.
https://www.google.com/maps/@39.0347307 ... a=!3m1!1e3" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
so, this bridge never had 4 tracks, and the northbound track that separates from the southbound south of odenton has always been one track?
 #1458943  by gprimr1
 
It still amazes to this day the Silver line was built without at least three tracks. It should have been built with 4. While some have stated the purpose of the DC metro was to bring people into DC and thus express tracks weren't as needed, the Silver line also serves to connect the DC area to Dulles airport.

As it stands now, it takes 1h 11m to go from Largo to Reston via the Silver line vs 45 minutes by car. Adding 1-2 extra tracks would have allowed Metro to run "Dulles Express" trains. Imagine this service:

Largo Town Center
Stadium Armory
Lefant Plaza
Metro Center
Rosslyn
East Falls Church
Reston East

Only stopping at those stations. With service like that, Dulles could easily leverage it's larger airfield, more international destinations, and lack of noise/mileage curfews and compete with BWI and DCA.
 #1458953  by Sand Box John
 
"gprimr1"
As it stands now, it takes 1h 11m to go from Largo to Reston via the Silver line vs 45 minutes by car. Adding 1-2 extra tracks would have allowed Metro to run "Dulles Express" trains.


Facts to pass on to you:

WMATA cut the top speeds trains ran at by one third back in the 1990s.
They did that to extend the life of the railroad and the rolling stock that ran on it.
They would have had to do neither had they procured rolling stock at the same pace they were building out the railroad.
 #1459052  by gprimr1
 
Even with that reduction, if they had included a third track with a few 4 track stations for passing, the Dulles Flyer express could have been a reality and opened up Dulles for people on the east side of DC.
 #1459155  by Sand Box John
 
"gprimr1"
Even with that reduction, if they had included a third track with a few 4 track stations for passing, the Dulles Flyer express could have been a reality and opened up Dulles for people on the east side of DC.


Historical ridership statistics disagree. That's why WMATA claims the problem is the Rosslyn bottleneck not the D&G Junction bottleneck.
 #1459650  by JDC
 
YOLO wrote:Decided to put my ideas onto a fantasy map: https://i.imgur.com/GjdiJ2Q.png

I also thought that a DC streetcar circle line would be interesting: https://i.imgur.com/cV2JdaB.png
To me, the problem with that map is that there is still no great way for those on the ends of the lines in VA to get right into DC quickly, without looping around, such as the new Yellow having to go all the way over to MD before getting into DC proper. The yellow line bridge is great because it ties folks in VA right to L'Enfant plaza and all of the other lines (except the Red).
 #1466642  by johndmuller
 
The plan shown in the map is reasonably decent. Some Virginia riders from the south will not want to lose the L'Enfant route (at additional costs of various kinds, the green line could be split (half to go thru town via Union Sta,) to allow half the yellows to go thru via L'Enfant).

If the silver-orange is a 3 or preferably 4 track run between East and West Falls Church, the M street portion of that stream could continue along I-66 a little further beyond East Falls Church to its tunnel into DC, creating a bit of an express run there. If further express running is desired, the Tyson's stations could be bypassed by a short segment continuing around Tyson's on the toll road median instead of turning onto Chain Bridge Road (although I would imagine that a lot of people want to go to Tyson's, so this could be counterproductive).

Despite the allure of airports as a selling point for transit projects (because it is one of the few places where some people would consider going without a car), the Dulles station is probably not going to be so much of a ridership draw (although its employees may find it attractive.)
 #1466930  by JDC
 
People say that about Dulles, the issue is WMATA's operating hours may limit some/many employees' ability to use the system because of their start/end times. 9 to 5, sure, WMATA to Dulles works. But if you're in service industry working at a 24/7 airport, WMATA's reduced hours don't work so well for you. It will be very interesting to watch the station numbers for Dulles once we get those figures.
 #1467041  by farecard
 
JDC wrote:People say that about Dulles, the issue is WMATA's operating hours may limit some/many employees' ability to use the system because of their start/end times. 9 to 5, sure, WMATA to Dulles works. But if you're in service industry working at a 24/7 airport, WMATA's reduced hours don't work so well for you. It will be very interesting to watch the station numbers for Dulles once we get those figures.
And I wonder how many airline passengers will use it, given that it is outdoors in our inhospitable climate and a LONG way from the terminal itself.
 #1467196  by Sand Box John
 
"farecard"
And I wonder how many airline passengers will use it, given that it is outdoors in our inhospitable climate and a LONG way from the terminal itself.


The valet parking lot is not under cover like have the length of the station platform. Access to the station will not require using shuttle buses to get to the rental car agencies or satellite parking lots. One must walk past the station entrance to access garage 1, Access to garage 2 is mostly a wash when compared to the station, however it doesn't provide the luxury of a moving walkway that is used to access the station and garage 1.