Re: ALCO power, I ran across the attached image online. ALCO power on the old west side freight line.
Attachments:
hlmisc9.jpeg (56.67 KiB) Viewed 5750 times
Railroad Forums
Moderator: Liquidcamphor
giljanus wrote:Only the northern end was electrified. The photo is shot towards the east - the electrification ends at the Morgan Parcel Post Building (six tracks to accommodate 36 cars).That's an interesting bit of history. I do have 2 questions:
The NYC used their Q, R and some S and T electric units along with forty-one class DES-3 three-power (Electric/Diesel/Battery) box cab units to run the West Line - in the 50's Alcos started to appear as the 3rd rail started to be removed.
See http://www.thehighline.org/galleries/im ... -operation to see the southern end, including the DES-3 units.
See http://www.northeast.railfan.net/electric6.html for some more shots of NYC Electrics (not all of which worked in NY area).
And of course, none of the above has anything to do with commuter trains.
Gil, known as Bill somedays ...
MACTRAXX wrote: [SNIP]I agree wholeheartedly with MACTRAXX ... that period of time on LIRR was much more interesting than the current era, due to the variety of equipment, both passenger cars and motive power, in service.
The LIRR changed after the MTA took over when they gradually standardized the equipment through the 70s years...the period of the late 60s/early 70s was a interesting time with the variety of equipment in Diesel service with many coaches acquired from other railroads that were eliminating or cutting passenger service...and the interesting locomotives the LIRR used before the coming of the EMD MP15s/GP38s/SW1001s in basically 1977...
Thoughts from MACTRAXX
wilsonpooch wrote:1977 sounds about right.WP: That was the year of the major LIRR order from EMD that introduced the GP38s,MP15s and SW1001s to the LIRR...
MACTRAXX wrote:The EMDs lasted so long probably because they were not turbocharged. Turbochargers permit more horsepower with fewer cylinders, but along with that goes increased engine wear. GP-38s were not as fuel-efficient as the Alcos, but the extra cylinders with lower hp (16-cylinder model 645 normally aspirated + 2,000hp vs. 12 cylinder Alco model 251 engine with turbocharger = 2,000hp) meant that the engine didn't have to work as hard. And a turbocharger failure is expensive to fix.wilsonpooch wrote:1977 sounds about right.WP: That was the year of the major LIRR order from EMD that introduced the GP38s,MP15s and SW1001s to the LIRR...
The LIRR not only retired all the older diesel units but also returned the leased EMD GP7s and/or GP9s to Bangor and Aroostook and Precision National Corporation
(leasing company)
Up to the point that these leased units arrived on the LIRR in the mid 70s the LIRR was an all-ALCO diesel railroad...something we will never see again...
The 1977 EMD order was arguably the most successful locomotive order in the history of the LIRR noting their longevity and noting that previously used locomotives had a short
LIRR use life in comparison...both the F-M C Liners and ALCO C420s (except 222-229) served the LIRR for under 15 years in each case...MACTRAXX