Railroad Forums 

  • M9 and M9A Procurement & Acceptance

  • Discussion of the past and present operations of the Long Island Rail Road.
Discussion of the past and present operations of the Long Island Rail Road.

Moderator: Liquidcamphor

 #1471096  by adamj023
 
ConstanceR46 wrote:Saw photos of the interiors; told not to share any photos. TL;DR they're pretty similar to the M7s; i think the vestibules are wider and the posters have been replaced with LCD screens.
Interior photos are publically available. This isn’t a trade secret and the cars will be publically accessible by the masses very soon. Even the engineering designs themselves as being for the mass transit authority were publically available. The cars are nicer than the M7 and seem to be a good balance for a modern trainset. It is a good replacement for the M3.
 #1471202  by Head-end View
 
Nicer than the M-7's? Would I be correct to assume the M-9 has the same full width cab with blocked cab-door window as the M-7's? If so, really no improvement for us railfans.......
 #1471318  by PlaneLoverA380
 
Hello guys, I'm new here. Sorry for my nickname :wink:
So we have 8 in Pueblo at TTCI, and 4 at Hillside. When do you think they will test near Mineola on the main line? I love railfanning Mineola in a club called Railstormers. Kinda sad to see the M3s go... :(
 #1471333  by ship-ahoy
 
Got a exterior photo by Hillside and not a very good one of the interior - very M7 like - looks like more closet space for equipment
Attachments:
LIRR M9 interior.jpg
LIRR M9 interior.jpg (467.7 KiB) Viewed 2576 times
LIRR M9.jpg
LIRR M9.jpg (650.29 KiB) Viewed 2576 times
 #1471452  by PlaneLoverA380
 
I got a photo of the interior and cab from Kawasaki with the pilot cars. Not my photo. Can't wait to railfan these with my friends! Will post some pics of the testing from all our cams!

Railstormers is a private group going on YouTube with some great clips!
Attachments:
IMG_6298.JPG
IMG_6298.JPG (123.47 KiB) Viewed 2566 times
IMG_6332.JPG
IMG_6332.JPG (137.18 KiB) Viewed 2566 times
 #1471483  by DutchRailnut
 
entire car pretty much is , a few differences and few upgrades and a new manufacturers plate, kawasaki vs bombardier
 #1471577  by PlaneLoverA380
 
How far we've come:
Attachments:
IMG_6419.JPG
IMG_6419.JPG (137.73 KiB) Viewed 2390 times
IMG_6418.JPG
IMG_6418.JPG (267.81 KiB) Viewed 2390 times
IMG_6417.JPG
IMG_6417.JPG (111.65 KiB) Viewed 2390 times
Last edited by PlaneLoverA380 on Sat May 05, 2018 7:30 pm, edited 1 time in total.
 #1471578  by PlaneLoverA380
 
And the current:
Attachments:
IMG_6416.JPG
IMG_6416.JPG (236.95 KiB) Viewed 2393 times
IMG_6415.JPG
IMG_6415.JPG (229.93 KiB) Viewed 2393 times
IMG_6295.JPG
IMG_6295.JPG (330.7 KiB) Viewed 2393 times
 #1471912  by PlaneLoverA380
 
9008 was spotted in Hillside. Drew a digital rendition of the car in service. In Hicksville, going to Penn.
Attachments:
IMG_6442.JPG
IMG_6442.JPG (605.84 KiB) Viewed 2161 times
 #1472530  by adamj023
 
Shouldn’t be long till we see these testing on LIRR tracks and additional trainsets being delivered. As ESA looks to be on track, they are going to need quick deliveries on a large volume of these M9 trainsets. I presume most of the real world tests were done in Colorado and the LIRR tests hopefully will go quickly and there shouldn’t be real issues. M7 had the tilting issues after cars first came out when tests were completed which was subsequently resolved. M9 testing looks to be more thorough.

Kawasaki is superior to Bombardier as a manufacturer for transportation. LIRR would have been in a huge bind if they chose Bombardier this time around considering their needs.
  • 1
  • 18
  • 19
  • 20
  • 21
  • 22
  • 58