I am most familiar with the MBTA. I generalize, but the T started as a way to remove streetcars from downtown and increase capacity. As the network grew to include subways and elevated, streetcar lines (now buses) were routed as feeders to the "Elevated" or eliminated as duplicate, a philosophy, or strategy, that continues today. Somewhere I have a 1920s photo of a elevated train with a streetcar across the platform and a bus in the street below, indicating the hierarchy of service (must be Ashmont).
I read something about the Purple Line extension, looked at LACMTA's maps and wondered why the grid of bus routes continues. Are buses on a rail corridor considered feeders to the rail line? Has the topic of hierarchy and connections come up in planning discussions/reports? I admit I didn't check Metrolink for connections.
Also- no transfers? Surely not, although a pass would eliminate that problem.
I read something about the Purple Line extension, looked at LACMTA's maps and wondered why the grid of bus routes continues. Are buses on a rail corridor considered feeders to the rail line? Has the topic of hierarchy and connections come up in planning discussions/reports? I admit I didn't check Metrolink for connections.
Also- no transfers? Surely not, although a pass would eliminate that problem.