by Allen Hazen
There was never an SD-58: I made the model designation up for something related to an SD60 as an SD38 is to an SD40: similar carbody and mechanical parts, but a non-turbocharged engine.
To the best of my knowledge, EMD has never marketed (at leasst for locomotive applications) a Roots-blown 710, but -- given the fundamental similarities between the 645 and 710 engine designs -- such a thing ought to be workable. Now, several railroads seem to have decided to de-turbo elderly SD40, turning them into ersatz SD38, for low-speed (switchin, hump pushing...) service. Turbocharged engines are more efficient than a Roots blown, but apparently -- if you are planning on using the locomotive exclusively at low power settings -- the engine efficiency and maintenance aspects of a Roots-blown engine seem more attractive than those of a turbocharged engine never run in the higher notches.
So. We are now getting to the stage where SD60 are being retired. Some are being cascaded for re-use as, e.g., work train power (cf. separate post on Metro).
Two questions: is there some reason why a 710 engine couldn't be rebuilt with Roots blowers? And, if it IS technically feasible, would it make operational/economic sense to de-turbo an SD60 for low power use?
In other words: There has never been an SD58, but is it plausible to think there some day MIGHT be?
To the best of my knowledge, EMD has never marketed (at leasst for locomotive applications) a Roots-blown 710, but -- given the fundamental similarities between the 645 and 710 engine designs -- such a thing ought to be workable. Now, several railroads seem to have decided to de-turbo elderly SD40, turning them into ersatz SD38, for low-speed (switchin, hump pushing...) service. Turbocharged engines are more efficient than a Roots blown, but apparently -- if you are planning on using the locomotive exclusively at low power settings -- the engine efficiency and maintenance aspects of a Roots-blown engine seem more attractive than those of a turbocharged engine never run in the higher notches.
So. We are now getting to the stage where SD60 are being retired. Some are being cascaded for re-use as, e.g., work train power (cf. separate post on Metro).
Two questions: is there some reason why a 710 engine couldn't be rebuilt with Roots blowers? And, if it IS technically feasible, would it make operational/economic sense to de-turbo an SD60 for low power use?
In other words: There has never been an SD58, but is it plausible to think there some day MIGHT be?