Railroad Forums 

Discussion of Canadian Passenger Rail Services such as AMT (Montreal), Go Transit (Toronto), VIA Rail, and other Canadian Railways and Transit

Moderator: Ken V

 #1434562  by Mark0f0
 
jhdeasy wrote:Trains magazine reports a trainset of Via equipment is "trapped" at Churchill, unable to return to Winnipeg.
Ouch. What would that be, a pair of F40PH-3D's, a coach or two, a sleeper and a diner?

If they're still running up to Gillam, they would need to generate another set. At a time, of course, that long haul equipment is stretched pretty thin over July in particular due to that Canada 150 promo.
 #1434687  by Ken V
 
Mark0f0 wrote:Ouch. What would that be, a pair of F40PH-3D's, a coach or two, a sleeper and a diner?
Right. The normal consist this time of year would be two F40 locomotives, a baggage car, two coaches, a diner and a Chateau sleeper,
 #1434749  by timberley
 
Ken V wrote:
Mark0f0 wrote:Ouch. What would that be, a pair of F40PH-3D's, a coach or two, a sleeper and a diner?
Right. The normal consist this time of year would be two F40 locomotives, a baggage car, two coaches, a diner and a Chateau sleeper,
The consist trapped is apparently: 6434 - 6402 - 8601 (baggage) - 8105 (coach) - 8118 (coach) - York (diner) - Chateau Richelieu

As it happens, 6402 is one of the 5 F40s wrapped in the Canada 150 scheme.
 #1434807  by mtuandrew
 
Is there any such thing as a barge capable of bringing the stranded equipment to active rail up the Nelson River, if such is even navigable? Alternately, how feasible would it be to ship this equipment to Moosonee? (And how badly does VIA need the equipment, versus draining the engine blocks & lines, letting it sit all winter, and hoping it can bring them back to life next year?)
 #1434814  by Mark0f0
 
At the very least, they'd have a set sitting around as spares to bring back the Gaspe service, would they not?


I wonder if anyone outside of VIA really has a good handle on just how much equipment they have that's fully operable, how much is programmed to be out of service for depot maintenance, how many spares they feel they need at Jasper, Vancouver, Winnipeg, etc. It'd be neat to run through scenarios like, "could VIA move The Canadian to 4X weekly in the summer". VIA's been shrinking for so many years now that I'm not sure if anyone in the company even remembers the last time there was growth.
 #1435229  by Tadman
 
mtuandrew wrote:Is there any such thing as a barge capable of bringing the stranded equipment to active rail up the Nelson River, if such is even navigable? Alternately, how feasible would it be to ship this equipment to Moosonee? (And how badly does VIA need the equipment, versus draining the engine blocks & lines, letting it sit all winter, and hoping it can bring them back to life next year?)
The Moosonee idea was the first one to hit me, too. I hadn't even considered what it would take to winterize this train and let it sit for 9 months. What a mess.

On the topic of equipment shortage, I don't think there will be one. If VIA can't spare two engines and five cars, they're in bigger trouble.
 #1435238  by Mark0f0
 
Tadman wrote:
mtuandrew wrote:Is there any such thing as a barge capable of bringing the stranded equipment to active rail up the Nelson River, if such is even navigable? Alternately, how feasible would it be to ship this equipment to Moosonee? (And how badly does VIA need the equipment, versus draining the engine blocks & lines, letting it sit all winter, and hoping it can bring them back to life next year?)
The Moosonee idea was the first one to hit me, too. I hadn't even considered what it would take to winterize this train and let it sit for 9 months.
Shouldn't be a problem 'winterizing' it. Just drain the water on the locos and the cars, and hope that there's no vandals. Might have to pull the batteries out too and put them somewhere warm. The diesel with a fungicide added will be just fine (or I'm sure defueling it wouldn't be a big deal, even if such is just running them in notch 8 until the tanks are empty, although I'm sure there's no shortage of people in Churchill who wouldn't mind some cheap diesel at this point!).
 #1435288  by Tadman
 
Makes sense. I'm curious if Churchill has a contractor capable of such work or if TMC folks will have to fly in. Churchill is a small town and who knows what kind of skilled diesel mechanics are available.
 #1435582  by Mark0f0
 
Tadman wrote:Makes sense. I'm curious if Churchill has a contractor capable of such work or if TMC folks will have to fly in. Churchill is a small town and who knows what kind of skilled diesel mechanics are available.
Probably would need an electrician to deal with the batteries. The rest is trivial, opening valves essentially. Probably have to send 2 guys up on a plane, just for safe working practices and all that.

I'd think they'd people at the Winnipeg Maintenance Center who could take care of that. Might need a forklift or something to deal with the batteries and a few hand tools, sourced locally.
 #1435815  by Tadman
 
Yeah that was my thought - fly in 1-2 guys to supervise 4-5 locals with some mechanical aptitude rather than fly in a whole team. Given the port and such industry, there's got to be a handful of mechanics in town.
 #1435816  by Tadman
 
And one other thing - this is turning into a giant MESS!

Evidently a few American motorcyclists rode the entire line on dirt bikes. They claim it's easy to fix. Despite not being engineers, there might be something to this. The local First Nation railroader have mentioned that they can fix this easily. Omnitrax claims they need a 6-8 week study and can't mobilize until next spring.

Me thinks this is a Chicago-style political game. You probably don't need a study and if this were a critical CP or CN main, they'd be moving dirty 24/7, not studying. Omnitrax is probably trying to hold the line hostage in order to get the gov't to buy them out as the line did not work out for a private operator.

I'd like to know more about the port and why the numbers didn't work out, Omnitrax is pretty good at what they do.
 #1435904  by mtuandrew
 
The muskeg DOES turn into a morass during the summer, but it seems fishy, doesn't it? Might be that OmniTrax thinks repairing the line is uneconomic or doesn't have cash on hand, or would rather sell this line to the Keewatin Railway Company. A First Nations corporation may have an easier time getting Provincial and Federal relief as well.
 #1436200  by Ken V
 
There is a report in the National Observer that VIA is looking into ways of retrieving its stranded train.
Most of the talk since rail service to Churchill in northern Manitoba was indefinitely interrupted by washouts and other track damage last month has focused on how to get goods and tourists in to the remote Hudson Bay community.

Via Rail has a different problem — how to get one of its trains out.

"Options to retrieve that (train) are being evaluated at this time," Via spokeswoman Mylene Belanger said.
http://www.nationalobserver.com/2017/06 ... il-closure" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
 #1436329  by mtuandrew
 
Great find, Ken. I also found this sentence interesting:
Omnitrax, which has been losing money on the line and has been trying to sell it, has said it has yet to get on the ground and fully inspect the almost-300 kilometres of remote track.
They really don't want to put in the time and effort, do they?
  • 1
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8