Thanks, all, for your input. I am so looking forward to this trip.
The new Acela: It's not Aveliable.
Railroad Forums
Moderator: Ken V
The adjacent airport is still used, but no longer for passenger service except chartered planes.This airport has been closed since November 30, 2013. It is being redeveloped into medium and high density housing.
Tadman wrote: The Edmonton station is in the boones and cabs were a bit tough to get, especially because CN had us 3 hours late. It would be nice if a coach bus met the train and ran to downtown and/or the airport. I would pay $50 extra to avoid the uncertainty of "will I get a cab in a foreign land at 2am?".How tough was it? Did everyone needing a ride find one?
northcornice wrote:Thanks for the update. My last several times through Edmonton have been e/b on a late train so I didn't know the airport was closed. It used to be amusing watching planes coming in low over the Canadian while we walked the platform.The adjacent airport is still used, but no longer for passenger service except chartered planes.This airport has been closed since November 30, 2013. It is being redeveloped into medium and high density housing.
bdawe wrote:I stumbled across this video https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6jmVFvL3vjQ from 1955 on CP's CanadianWhile it is a scheduled train, it’s frequency is terrible. What is it at now, twice a week starting October 14?
I got a bit of a kick out of one of the taglines : The oldest route; the newest trains
Today, of all the long distance trains in North America, I believe today's Canadian is The newest route; the oldest trains, the last regularly scheduled long distance train using almost entirely streamliner-era equipment running over CN's amalgam of of the Grand Trunk Pacific & Canadian Northern routes, which were the last transcontinental routes to be completed (later than the Western Pacific by a few years)
Tadman wrote:I have a real beef with all the online reviews complaining about how late the Canadian is.It's amazing how many people give the "Canadian" a "pass" just because of its equipment and on board service. Shouldn't it have some semblance of on-time performance? The train has lost ALL reason for existing, i.e. no utility. The train operates only two or three times per week, and has snuffed out nearly all ridership to intermediate communities due to high fares and a restrictive policy that basically prohibits spontaneous travel. Not that there is any - the train operates so late that few actually consider it viable public transportation.
vermontanan wrote: It's amazing how many people give the "Canadian" a "pass" just because of its equipment and on board service.I have yet to feel like I wanted to bail mid-trip on the Canadian (or any VIA train) like I have on the CZ and Empire Builder (if alternate transportation had been available in Havre MT....I probably would have!) And it was all due to the crew: Passengers caught in the middle of a dining car crew dispute and a very militaristic conductor. (Amtrak should get rid of their conductors as VIA did and have customer orientated Service Managers who know how to deal with the public instead of being on some ego trip)
Tadman wrote:If you're travelling for the view, you can take the Canadian and treat it as a vacation. When Via notes clear as a bell to arrange connecting travel the day after one arrives, and then one ignores that, it seems pretty stupid to complain about a late train.Why should unreliability be acceptable for a vacation?