Railroad Forums 

  • Oil Trains (RJMA / MARJ, OI-x, etc)

  • Guilford Rail System changed its name to Pan Am Railways in 2006. Discussion relating to the current operations of the Boston & Maine, the Maine Central, and the Springfield Terminal railroads (as well as the Delaware & Hudson while it was under Guilford control until 1988). Official site can be found here: PANAMRAILWAYS.COM.
Guilford Rail System changed its name to Pan Am Railways in 2006. Discussion relating to the current operations of the Boston & Maine, the Maine Central, and the Springfield Terminal railroads (as well as the Delaware & Hudson while it was under Guilford control until 1988). Official site can be found here: PANAMRAILWAYS.COM.

Moderator: MEC407

 #1318062  by 690
 
Just pulling past 113 now. Not sure if they'll keep going, or can it at Waterville for a while, nothing on the scanner so far.
 #1318151  by KSmitty
 
They made NMJ around sunset. They recrewed at Waterville but carried on otherwise. I was surprised they didn't fuel 'em up. They should have, 989 ran out around 77.
 #1318171  by 690
 
I'm more surprised they made it to NMJ, the speed they were going. I take it they did ~5 the entire way?
 #1318185  by newpylong
 
Message I got:
Loaded oil train that was at Rott Jct on 2/13 stalled at MP70 tonight. Rear unit out of fuel, lead unit says 'E'. Ooops! So we took 2 engines out to drag it to NMJ now we're doing a fuel transfer. I don't know if her water dumped yet. No water here anymore."

Incompetence comes to mind.
 #1318207  by MEC407
 
Someone needs to update this bumper sticker with the new corporate identity...
Attachments:
Guilford bumper sticker.jpg
Guilford bumper sticker.jpg (25.92 KiB) Viewed 3888 times
 #1318248  by jbvb
 
A perspective on the volatility of Bakken crude that I hadn't heard before:

http://www.desmogblog.com/2014/12/11/no ... ns-rolling" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Fair-use quote: "What this new regulation implies is that the North Dakota Industrial Commission is aware that Bakken producers have not only been shipping dangerous oil that has high levels of natural gas liquids (NGLs), such as butane, that are part of the crude oil mixture as it comes out of the ground but that they have been actively adding such explosive NGLs to the oil prior to shipping it by rail." The NDIC appears to want to prevent adding NGLs to crude before shipment.
 #1318249  by MEC407
 
Diluted bitumen (a.k.a. tar sands oil) is apparently problematic too — that's what the CN oil train that crashed and burned over the weekend was carrying.
 #1318292  by KSmitty
 
Train was formally delivered to CM&Q today late in the afternoon. Its been 4-5 hours and is already to Derby. 989 needed not only fuel, but water too. Don't know if it got cool enough to dump or if it was just in need of some water, but anyway, another delay.
 #1318322  by MEC407
 
Video by MaineRailFanner:

http://youtu.be/RLygFh12Y2c?t=19s" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
 #1326590  by MEC407
 
From the Bangor Daily News:
Bangor Daily News wrote:Oil trains are once again rolling through Maine after slowing to a near halt following the deadly train accident almost two years ago in Lac-Megantic, a small town just across the border in Quebec, according to state records.

Pan Am Railways reported carrying 37,128 barrels through the state in February, the first train-borne oil shipments since March of 2014, according to the most recent figures from the Maine Department of Environmental Protection.
. . .
Shipments of oil by rail through Maine dropped off from a peak of 5.2 million barrels in 2012, the year before the Quebec crash, to just 15,545 barrels in 2014.
Read the rest of the article at: http://bangordailynews.com/2015/04/16/b ... ng-hiatus/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
 #1326597  by bml54
 
if there going from watterville-nmj that bull crap all ive seen is a few mis matched oil cars in a short freight train every so often but no oil trains.
 #1326599  by bml54
 
and they might go through at night so if thats the case pan am might be running them but i go by nmj 2 to 3 times a week last oil train i saw there was a 45 car oil train that had been sitiing for a year there.
 #1326600  by bml54
 
if they run at night i dont see them and i do regret not taking videos of the bnsf loco's that would pass my house daily and make it feel like it was going to fall apart, or par doing track upgrades, and finnaly the train with 2 sd40's, 1 dash 8 from ns, and 3 bnsf dash 9's hopefully par will do some track work this summer and these trains will be back on track.
 #1326602  by newpylong
 
Easy on all the posts. People here make an effort to post factual and well thought out items, not rants.

37,000 barrels is only around 45 tank cars. Do you count every DOT111 tank that goes by?
  • 1
  • 59
  • 60
  • 61
  • 62
  • 63
  • 66