Overheard a local was heading up the Mountain Branch and back today. Not sure what they had, but they were bringing cars.
|| REGIONALRAIL ||
Railroad Forums
Moderator: MEC407
newpylong wrote:LNG isnt moved by rail so it had to be LPG if that is still Dead River.Seriously? Geez, it's not like they would be going out of their way since they look to be doing considerable business in the immediate vicinity anyway. How much does it cost to cut in a switch panel anyway?
Osterman propane down in Adams, MA has been inquiring with the RR as of late about getting their switch put back in but the RR has basically laughed at them. But it shows the smaller distribution facilities are looking to capitalize on incoming rail again.
Hux wrote:A switch (just one) can run you 60K or more for materials and labor. Maintaining a frog is also a cost on top of normal track. The 'it isnt that hard to throw in a switch' argument doesn't always tread waternewpylong wrote:LNG isnt moved by rail so it had to be LPG if that is still Dead River.Seriously? Geez, it's not like they would be going out of their way since they look to be doing considerable business in the immediate vicinity anyway. How much does it cost to cut in a switch panel anyway?
Osterman propane down in Adams, MA has been inquiring with the RR as of late about getting their switch put back in but the RR has basically laughed at them. But it shows the smaller distribution facilities are looking to capitalize on incoming rail again.
newpylong wrote:LNG isnt moved by rail so it had to be LPG if that is still Dead River.One would think that the railroad would be able to come up with enough parts from around the system to make up a complete switch so that they could serve this customer.
Osterman propane down in Adams, MA has been inquiring with the RR as of late about getting their switch put back in but the RR has basically laughed at them. But it shows the smaller distribution facilities are looking to capitalize on incoming rail again.
festis wrote:Either of the above would be the first non-Sappi revenue movement on the Branch that I can recall in the last 10 years. I have seen a load or two of ballast come out of Pike, but I assumed that was for internal consumption.I agree those are both significant. The LPG load in particular as that has recently become a significant part of PARs business everywhere. Propane is often replacing oil fired heat currently brought in by tanker. If you can imagine how many rail cars of propane it takes to replace oil loads by the tanker than I think we have an idea of the upper bounds that this business has.
Mikejf wrote:Pike hasn't loaded any railcars since the purchase of the location from Blue Rock that I am aware of. They would have to load on the main now, as the siding has been OOS for a long time"main" is a stretch at this point I think of it as a 5 mile long siding from Portland to Westbrook...
newpylong wrote:Looks like this was a dense rail area at one timeVery much so. It kind of gives you an idea of why it made sense for BM and MEC to have a Portland Terminal subsidiary to serve all the industries in Portland, South Portland, and Westbrook.
festis wrote: "main" is a stretch at this point I think of it as a 5 mile long siding from Portland to Westbrook...Now THAT is funny. No doubt the derailed something out there. The track is starting to get more waves in it than Casco Bay. But they stopped crushing at Pike about 5 years ago or more. So doubtful that a load of Ballast left there.
MEC407 wrote:There is a reproduction map around that shows the Portland Terminal trackage at the time. There was an unbelievable amount of business back then. It was post WWII.newpylong wrote:Looks like this was a dense rail area at one timeVery much so. It kind of gives you an idea of why it made sense for BM and MEC to have a Portland Terminal subsidiary to serve all the industries in Portland, South Portland, and Westbrook.