Mcoov wrote:Why do the decks on these locomotives seem shorter than that of a standard SD40-2? They look like those off a Geep.Many are ex SD45-2s which had longer hoods at the cost of larger decks.
Railroad Forums
Moderator: MEC407
Mcoov wrote:Why do the decks on these locomotives seem shorter than that of a standard SD40-2? They look like those off a Geep.Many are ex SD45-2s which had longer hoods at the cost of larger decks.
Mcoov wrote:Why do the decks on these locomotives seem shorter than that of a standard SD40-2? They look like those off a Geep.Because they are rebuilt SD45's or SD45-2's, which had shorter decks.
Stephen wrote: - Is there a difference between an SD40-2, an SD40M-2 and an SD40-2R? Helm listed some of the units as SD40M-2 and Trona called some of the same units SD40-2R. Are these just different ways of stating rebuilt to SD40-2 standards?As far as I know SD40M-2's were rebuilt SP SD45's. The Trona units are rebuilt SD45-2's so the SD40-2R can be applied to them. "R" is a versatile letter and gets applied to alot of models modified or rebuilt after initial purchase. But really the only difference is on the outside, internally they should all be SD40-2's. Every railroad does things different, look at CN who calls chop nose GP9's "GP9RM's" While CP calls basically the same exact thing a "GP9u." Its a "potaytoe/potahtoe" type of deal.
KSmitty wrote: As far as I know SD40M-2's were rebuilt SP SD45's. The Trona units are rebuilt SD45-2's so the SD40-2R can be applied to them. "R" is a versatile letter and gets applied to alot of models modified or rebuilt after initial purchase. But really the only difference is on the outside, internally they should all be SD40-2's. Every railroad does things different, look at CN who calls chop nose GP9's "GP9RM's" While CP calls basically the same exact thing a "GP9u." Its a "potaytoe/potahtoe" type of deal.That's what I figured, but I wasn't sure.
Mcoov wrote:Who are FUS, NdeM, and QNS&L?FUS = Ferrocarriles Nacionales de Mexico
Stephen wrote:All,
Below is all of the information I have been able to pull together on these 'new' units. I am sure there are errors, so please let me know and I will update this and repost. If anyone can get serial numbers for MEC 612 (ex HLCX 6415), or MEC 614 (ex HLCX 6427), I am having a lot of trouble finding any details on these locomotives. A list of the sources I used is at the bottom.
(Also, a big thank you to Otto for getting this in a form I could post!)
Stephen
my ESPEE MODELERS ARCHIVE wrote:In 1993, SP contracted with Morrison Knudsen to supply 133 SD40M-2's, as part of the contract, SP was to supply no carbodies or shells. This sparked a frantic search for 133 six axle locos suitable for rebuilding. The search turned up 30 SD40's, 97 SD45's and 6 SDP45's. Due to another kitbash happening at MK at the time, 10 of the rebuilt SD45's received GP40 rear hoods and radiators. This resulted in 4 distinct versions, although all classified SD40M-2.See this site for more information.
ferroequinarchaeologist wrote:Before somebody asks:Gracias...
FUS = Ferrocarriles Unidos del Sureste
which is part of NdeM
Buenas noches.
PBM
cp8558 wrote:I would offer just two minor corrections. The 602 is still classified as a straight SD40, having never been rebuilt. 610-613 and 619 are classified as SD40-2's (ex SD45) while 614-618 are SD40M-2's (ex SD45-2) as you stated.Re: 602 - Thanks, I had seen both and I figured the SD40 was a typo since it was the only one. I guess the Sd40-2 was the typo.