Pan Am Railways (PAR) Maintenance of Way (MoW) Activity

Guilford Rail System changed its name to Pan Am Railways in 2006. Discussion relating to the current operations of the Boston & Maine, the Maine Central, and the Springfield Terminal railroads (as well as the Delaware & Hudson while it was under Guilford control until 1988). Official site can be found here: PANAMRAILWAYS.COM.

Moderator: MEC407

gokeefe
Posts: 11973
Joined: Sat Feb 16, 2008 12:28 pm
Location: Winthrop, Maine

Re: Pan Am Railways (PAR) Maintenance of Way (MoW) Activity

Post by gokeefe » Tue Jul 02, 2019 11:37 am

Very interesting. Thanks for the detail! Will the main line still be DCS?
gokeefe

User avatar
690
Posts: 783
Joined: Sun Sep 16, 2012 12:50 am
Location: Maine

Re: Pan Am Railways (PAR) Maintenance of Way (MoW) Activity

Post by 690 » Tue Jul 02, 2019 11:55 am

It’ll be DCS between CPF119-CPF150. Beyond that, I doubt it.

CPF363
Posts: 669
Joined: Mon Apr 20, 2009 9:00 pm

Re: Pan Am Railways (PAR) Maintenance of Way (MoW) Activity

Post by CPF363 » Wed Jul 03, 2019 5:04 am

Looks from the posting that most of the new rail is for curves except for the two long stretches between 130.2-143 and 146.6-162.3. Which switch will be moving as a result of the lengthening of the siding, Penny or Blake?

User avatar
690
Posts: 783
Joined: Sun Sep 16, 2012 12:50 am
Location: Maine

Re: Pan Am Railways (PAR) Maintenance of Way (MoW) Activity

Post by 690 » Wed Jul 03, 2019 7:30 am

The Penney side, although the ROW exists to extend it on either side, but obviously there's a crossing right next to Blake. And it makes sense that the curves are being hit, those are, generally speaking, the worst spots. The long stretches from Belgrade to Winthrop, and Monmouth to Lewiston aren't nearly as bad, but still are in pretty rough shape, and the mainline through New Gloucester is real rough, especially just west of Penney.

newpylong
Posts: 4283
Joined: Thu Jun 28, 2007 12:32 pm
Location: NH

Re: Pan Am Railways (PAR) Maintenance of Way (MoW) Activity

Post by newpylong » Wed Jul 03, 2019 7:52 am

Where was the CTC recently retired? The few stretches between Waterville and NMJ right?

User avatar
690
Posts: 783
Joined: Sun Sep 16, 2012 12:50 am
Location: Maine

Re: Pan Am Railways (PAR) Maintenance of Way (MoW) Activity

Post by 690 » Wed Jul 03, 2019 10:31 am

Hermon (CPF66) to CPF107.

pnolette
Posts: 239
Joined: Sat Mar 13, 2004 3:33 pm
Location: Maine

Re: Pan Am Railways (PAR) Maintenance of Way (MoW) Activity

Post by pnolette » Wed Jul 03, 2019 12:30 pm

Thanks for the list 690.Any idea when they will start or how long this will take?
Peter B&MMEC

bostontrainguy
Posts: 1591
Joined: Sun Oct 23, 2011 11:14 am

Re: Pan Am Railways (PAR) Maintenance of Way (MoW) Activity

Post by bostontrainguy » Wed Jul 03, 2019 1:17 pm

Why the upgrade now? Is this in preparation for the Port Saint John port expansion?
Last edited by bostontrainguy on Thu Jul 04, 2019 7:54 am, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
690
Posts: 783
Joined: Sun Sep 16, 2012 12:50 am
Location: Maine

Re: Pan Am Railways (PAR) Maintenance of Way (MoW) Activity

Post by 690 » Wed Jul 03, 2019 8:46 pm

I highly doubt it. If I had to guess, I'd say it has more to do with the resurgence of paper traffic from Sappi, Rileys, and Rumford.

gokeefe
Posts: 11973
Joined: Sat Feb 16, 2008 12:28 pm
Location: Winthrop, Maine

Re: Pan Am Railways (PAR) Maintenance of Way (MoW) Activity

Post by gokeefe » Wed Jul 03, 2019 9:26 pm

Thinking this over again I would say Poland Spring is probably the more compelling rationale. The paper traffic resurgence is somewhat more recent than the bottled water containers. Waterville is the intermodal terminal for PS. This capital improvement program dovetails nicely with their needs. It also takes great advantage of capital improvements made from Royal Junction south to leverage meaningful operational improvements to the north.

It is notable to me that at long last the watershed from the passenger rail investments has finally reached the freight only territory.
gokeefe

User avatar
690
Posts: 783
Joined: Sun Sep 16, 2012 12:50 am
Location: Maine

Re: Pan Am Railways (PAR) Maintenance of Way (MoW) Activity

Post by 690 » Thu Jul 04, 2019 6:45 am

No... notice how the signal territory stops at Leeds Junction? I'm going to go with paper coming off the branch. They've had plenty of time to do improvements for the water, that's not a new thing (and in fact they did, by getting Wtvl - 185 back up to 25 several years ago). Paper traffic pays the bills a lot better than the water traffic, and given how close they were to losing most of it just a couple years ago, it doesn't take a genius to figure out that if you want to sustain what's left, you need to provide more reliable service. Tie that into rumors that Nine Dragons is/will be paying for track upgrades on the Rumford Branch, and I'm confident that this is for paper traffic.

Also the fact that the track sucks, and it needs to be replaced.

newpylong
Posts: 4283
Joined: Thu Jun 28, 2007 12:32 pm
Location: NH

Re: Pan Am Railways (PAR) Maintenance of Way (MoW) Activity

Post by newpylong » Thu Jul 04, 2019 10:58 am

I agree with 690, service to the branch is the money maker, and needs serious attention. I'd be willing to bet that the pair of trains that traverse it daily bring in more revenue alone than all the PS water out of Waterville for a week.

Was going to ask the obvious question about when the white elephant in the room - the branch itself, would get some TLC and who would pay for it. Getting that back to 25 would be a game changer.

User avatar
690
Posts: 783
Joined: Sun Sep 16, 2012 12:50 am
Location: Maine

Re: Pan Am Railways (PAR) Maintenance of Way (MoW) Activity

Post by 690 » Fri Jul 05, 2019 12:11 pm

Without a doubt, especially since Pan Am is also charging for every car that gets spotted at Rileys and Rumford as well. However, the thing about doing work on the branch is that the FRA will have to be involved with any increases in speed, as Pan Am (perhaps shortsightedly) dropped the speed in the timetable to Class I, or 10 mph. They've avoided this issue by keeping the timetable speed east of Waterville at 25, but again, this issue comes into play for the mainline west of Waterville, which was dropped to 25, and is one of the likely reasons that despite the improvements being made, all the crossings being rebuilt are only being rebuilt to Class II standards.

Tom M
Posts: 52
Joined: Fri May 20, 2016 2:16 pm
Location: NH

Re: Pan Am Railways (PAR) Maintenance of Way (MoW) Activity

Post by Tom M » Sat Jul 06, 2019 5:18 pm

The top eastbound signal at CPF 243 is visible again. The caterpillars must have chewed away the foliage.

gokeefe
Posts: 11973
Joined: Sat Feb 16, 2008 12:28 pm
Location: Winthrop, Maine

Re: Pan Am Railways (PAR) Maintenance of Way (MoW) Activity

Post by gokeefe » Sat Jul 06, 2019 5:34 pm

690 wrote:
Fri Jul 05, 2019 12:11 pm
However, the thing about doing work on the branch is that the FRA will have to be involved with any increases in speed, as Pan Am (perhaps shortsightedly) dropped the speed in the timetable to Class I, or 10 mph.
With regards to this and what you mentioned about the main line my impression is that Pan Am simply doesn't consider Class 3 to be worth it. If the Rumford Branch could be upgraded (and permanently maintained) at Class 2 that would be a huge step forward.
gokeefe

Return to “Pan Am Railways (formerly Guilford Rail System)”