Railroad Forums 

  • Amtrak Desert Wind Los Angeles LA - Las Vegas NV Past Present Future

  • Discussion related to Amtrak also known as the National Railroad Passenger Corp.
Discussion related to Amtrak also known as the National Railroad Passenger Corp.

Moderators: GirlOnTheTrain, mtuandrew, Tadman

 #260144  by kmillard
 
While I am in at least partial agreement with the sentiments about restioraing at least a portion of the Desert Wind route (Mornings to Vegas and Evening returns to SoCal as opposed to the DW which called on Vegas at 7 AM roughly westbound and 8:40 PM Eastbound), I'm not sure I see the correlation with NJT's proposal to restore Atlantic City service. :wink:
 #260149  by Budd1964
 
Both are gambling meccas. in Amtraks case running service either from california or from Chicago may just help the bottom line. Amtrak lost a whole market when it lost the Desert Wind. Amtrak need to tap into that market at a resonable price and without pricing itself out of the market as as
I also suggested on the NJT Atlantic city

 #260158  by John_Perkowski
 
Where do you propose to find the funding to pay for this?

EVERY Amtrak train loses money. That means there has to be funding within Amtrak's annual DOT grant, or CA and NV sign up for 403(b) service.

Please show me the money trail, gentlemen.

John Perkowski
Throwing the $$ wet blanket

 #260162  by NealG
 
John_Perkowski wrote:Where do you propose to find the funding to pay for this?

EVERY Amtrak train loses money. That means there has to be funding within Amtrak's annual DOT grant, or CA and NV sign up for 403(b) service.

Please show me the money trail, gentlemen.

John Perkowski
Throwing the $$ wet blanket
They could do what is done in everywhere else in Nevada -put slot machines and blackjack tables on the train for use while within Nevada (I'm half kidding).
 #260168  by Budd1964
 
We will have ot get the money fro m the states that the train will service, whether the train goes fronm chicago or california. With the
budget defiect the way i t is we need to have state money, Las Vegas sponsorship as with the NJT AC adventure and affordable price so Amtrak compete with my dominating bus industry

 #260374  by wigwagfan
 
Given that Las Vegas casinos seem to have money for anything, why can't the casinos simply fund a train of their own?

There are already casino jets, casino busses, and the casinos seem to know everything there is about hotels and restaurants. They have the money to buy and maintain equipment. All they need is a railroad operator (read: an engineer, a conductor and a locomotive) - and I'm sure UP will gladly oblige - for the right price.
 #260390  by hhswami
 
Which would be harder, finding the money to re-start service to Las Vegas, or the rail to run a train on? An outside provider would most likely find the cost for the rights to the freight track access unreasonable, given the schedule treatment similar to Amtrak. Only a government entity, with either more money or political power, could pull it off...

Unless George Bush somehow talks UP into it. Maybe it's been his idea of privatization all along.

 #260412  by Ashman
 
Amtrak attempted to restore service to Las Vegas a few years ago, with one run leaving SoCal early in the morning, arriving in Vegas early afternoon, then turning around mid-to-late afternoon, arriving in LA between 11 and midnight. Amtrak even had the equipment lined up to use on this run, they were running time trials, andhad funding secured. Union Pacific wanted nothing to do with the project as it is, part of UP's requirements for the service was that Amtrak had to fund double-tracking the entire line and cede priority.
 #260413  by jp1822
 
Best I think you one can hope for is what Ashman mentions - corridor type service between LA and Las Vegas only. Course, this requires cooperation with the Union Pacific RR and it doesn't appear that this will happen any time soon! The trainset was supposed to be the Talgo that has since been sold to the State of Washington (or Oregon) I believe. It runs on the Amtrak Cascades route with the rest of the Talgos. I remember the advertisements in various Amtrak literature for startup of this service "to commence at a date to be announced." I think it was 2001 or 2002.

 #260605  by crazy_nip
 
when people go to vegas, they want to get there and get back, not spend 2 days on a train getting there each way

give me a break...

 #260644  by kmillard
 
crazy_nip wrote:when people go to vegas, they want to get there and get back, not spend 2 days on a train getting there each way

give me a break...
Actually, I'm not much for going to Vegas at all as I despise that town. I derived absolutely no enjoyment from my long weekend there a year ago in February (although part of that was from having a touch of laryngitis courtesy of the flu and lost my glorious singing voice for a short period).

That said, I don't believe the issue with the delay in startup had all that much to due with lack of potential riders. One of the excuses I recall dealt with the impact this new train would have on a certain species of desert tortoise. I remember a number of us here on this forum had a field day with THAT one at the time it was first discussed about 6 years ago.

 #260680  by Jishnu
 
CalTrans (Amtrak California) might get to Reno way before anything will ever make it to Vegas.

 #260717  by kmillard
 
Jishnu wrote:CalTrans (Amtrak California) might get to Reno way before anything will ever make it to Vegas.
Well..... Assuming there are no desert tortoises around Donner Lake to protect, you may well be right. :P
 #1530385  by carajul
 
Done the LV-LA trip on I-15 a few times and it sux. I-15 is 2 lanes past Barstow slow as hell too many cars crazy aggressive drivers. 5-6 hrs of torture. Approx 200,000 people per weekend make the drive and a ton more during conventions. Anyone who leaves LA on a friday afternoon must be insane.

Seems like common sense to have rail service. LA union Station is in downtown its very convenient.

Flying is not worth it its the same travel time door to door and LAX location is terrible.

Why no rail service?