Railroad Forums 

  • Siemens Venture Single Level Cars for CA/IL/Midwest

  • Discussion related to Amtrak also known as the National Railroad Passenger Corp.
Discussion related to Amtrak also known as the National Railroad Passenger Corp.

Moderators: GirlOnTheTrain, mtuandrew, Tadman

 #1499716  by mtuandrew
 
njt/mnrrbuff wrote:Yes, the Comets won't be around forever. The Comet IIs are the oldest comets operating on NJT. The Horizon cars were based off of the design of the original NJT Comet IIs. If the Comet IIs are going to be retired soon, then I'm sure that the Horizons will as well. It will be a welcoming sight to see the Siemens single level cars operating in the Heartland and also covering trains in California as well. It sounds like Siemens will be the manufacturer for the passenger cars to operate on the majority of Amtrak routes, especially in the Northeast.
And the California Comet IBs (Comarrows) are even older than any other Comets in daily service, and aren’t like any other car on the rails. In good shape, but elderly orphans.
 #1499785  by eolesen
 
As long as there are still spare parts around, nothing is too old to keep running.... and the Horizons aren't that old.
 #1500099  by tomj
 
njt/mnrrbuff wrote:Yes, the Comets won't be around forever. The Comet IIs are the oldest comets operating on NJT. The Horizon cars were based off of the design of the original NJT Comet IIs. If the Comet IIs are going to be retired soon, then I'm sure that the Horizons will as well. It will be a welcoming sight to see the Siemens single level cars operating in the Heartland and also covering trains in California as well. It sounds like Siemens will be the manufacturer for the passenger cars to operate on the majority of Amtrak routes, especially in the Northeast.
The Horizons were built in the 80s and Amtrak is short on equipment, why would they junk them? Even junking the Amfleets doesn't make complete sense.
 #1500102  by tomj
 
gokeefe wrote:
tomj wrote:Even junking the Amfleets doesn't make complete sense.
It must be done. The windows on those cars are too small and they have reached the end of their service life. Amtrak pays dearly to operate this fleet using custom made parts and refurbished shells.

Siemens has a global presence and will likely be around for decades to come.
That is all well in good, but is the Amfleet replacement going to increase the size of the fleet? The pride of your supplier doesn't matter if you can't buy from them. Amtrak has been dealing with equipment shortages for the better part of a decade and never has extra cars when states want new corridors. Based on present politics, I wouldn't put it past Trump shutting the government down for 5 weeks over cutting Amtrak or keeping them from getting an order of more than 500 cars for the Amfleet 1 Replacement.

As for keeping them around, I would only keeping them around for experimenting for at most 10 years post replacement. And longer if they are kept in reserve. As for being too old, the Heritage cars were far older when they were retired and Via still uses Budd equipment. If it means more revenue and getting the states to pay for it, I think Amtrak can manage. Hell the trains near me are using refurbished Comet cars that are nearly a decade older. Even if a replacement for experimental whatever cars is hard to come by, having more passengers than you know what to do with is better than never having gotten them at all.
Last edited by tomj on Sun Feb 10, 2019 10:09 pm, edited 1 time in total.
 #1500141  by njtmnrrbuff
 
40+ years is a very long time for equipment to operate. While the Amfleets still continue to operate well, it isn’t worth the time and money to keep refurbishing them over and over at a certain point. It might be possible that some may stick around a little longer than anticipated but in general, it’s time to order replacement coaches for Amfleets. Capacity on trains like the New Haven to Springfield shuttles need to be improved. In fact, with the pilot service of extending two of the shuttles to Greenfield, its a must that more cars get added to the shuttles. It might not hurt to run a four car shuttle or two.
 #1500157  by Arlington
 
benboston wrote:Is Amtrak allowed to issue bonds for funding?
I wish it were: then it could do things like build sidings to right-size routes by turning or dropping coaches.

But it can finance equipment by leasing, and PRIIA etc actually means that the price of lease or replacement equipment is now built into what the states pay. Which, in turn, is why some states would rather supply their own rolling stock if they can get a better deal than Amtrak than "the standard package" that Amtrak offers, such as North Carolina's owned vintage fleet and CA/IL/Midwest hope to.
 #1500207  by eolesen
 
njt/mnrrbuff wrote:40+ years is a very long time for equipment to operate.
Is it?

I say this as I sit on a train with several gallery cars having between 50 and 60 years in service....

Heck, there are Pullmans from the 1930's still going strong. If it's built well, and can be maintained, there's no reason to retire a car simply based on its age.
 #1500213  by east point
 
eolesen wrote:Heck, there are Pullmans from the 1930's still going strong. If it's built well, and can be maintained, there's no reason to retire a car simply based on its age.

The only real reasons for retirement is metal fatigue, bent frames, wreck damages, refurbishment cost. the only problem today is that equipment is built to closer tolerances to fatigue than the cars of yester year.
 #1500254  by Arlington
 
ADA Compliance and "large windows, improved climate control systems, improved seating and wi-fi, weather-tight doors and vestibles, and new designs for restrooms and passageways between cars."

I am not sure if this means wider doors, but being able to "do" wheelchairs fluently ends up being good for everyone.
 #1500279  by mtuandrew
 
True enough, Tad. The Horizon fleet ought to be railworthy as long as Amtrak cares to keep it that way, assuming it can find body-specific parts or order a small run of one-off pieces.

The question becomes, when do you stop sinking money into your 1991 Dodge Ram 12-passenger van and upgrade to a 2019 Mercedes Sprinter coach? And, at what point does it become more expensive to operate, repair, and reupholster that Dodge than the combined operation and purchase payments for a Mercedes? From secondhand experience I know that Ram vans are reliable for multiple hundreds of thousands of miles, but eventually you’re going to have door problems, rust-through, paint fading, windows delaminating, AC and heating issues, electrical faults... and we’ll say there’s a surprisingly large market for used one-owner “church vans” like these. All that aside, your Uncle Sam and his fifty kids will help finance the Sprinter for you, and you get to pick each and every option.

(For comparison: 1991 Dodge Ram Van and 2019 Mercedes-Benz Sprinter coach)
 #1500283  by eolesen
 
Nobody overhauls their personal vehicles interiors or mechanical systems. If they did, they'd also last 30-50 years....
 #1500288  by Arlington
 
Passenger tastes change. New cruise ships have bigger rooms, fewer windowless ones, and bigger windows on the ones that have them, and they could not just keep re doing the furniture in the old "port hole" ships.

At some point these design choices accumulate in such a way that overhauls don't cut it, or that, for all the changes, you might as well buy new. That moment has come.
 #1500301  by east point
 
That is good if Amtrak has deep pockets. Will that ever occur? Who knows. Until then keep the cars in a class 2 condition to be used as a surge fleet. We believe that rush times they would be better than leased commuter equipment. Thanksgiving - new years, Easter, summer rush are examples. Most importantly needed to cover some natural disaster or manmade disaster for what ever reason. The fires in California were one example.
  • 1
  • 16
  • 17
  • 18
  • 19
  • 20
  • 32