Planning PHL to Gloucester Mass. in May. No connect to North station?? MBTA service choices lacking.
Might drive.
Any ideas?
Might drive.
Any ideas?
Railroad Forums
Moderators: GirlOnTheTrain, mtuandrew, Tadman
gprimr1 wrote:The easiest transfer is Boston Back Bay to Boston North station via the Orange line. Subway service is pretty frequent.and will never be....unless via the Grand Jct.
Back in the day, it was two different railroads serving Boston, and they didn't build a tunnel to connect them. The tunnel wasn't funded as part of the big dig, so for the foreseeable future, they won't be connected.
BandA wrote:North-South rail link was quoted at $1 - $2 Billion, which was before the "Big Dig" ballooned to ~$16 Billion+. To justify that cost you need New York City levels of train traffic. Essentially a replacement for the Atlantic Ave. El and the old street running freight.They could alway bring back the Union Freight Railroad.
Grand Junction - to serve as a rail link, at a minimum needs a loop track around Beacon Park. Easy and cheap to design and build now, will be impossible after Harvard & Ma$$Pike redevelop.
Trainer wrote:When Amtrak has to move equipment back and forth from South and North, do they have to do an end-around or do they have more direct access?Equipment transfers for both Amtrak and the MBTA change ends at Beacon Park.
BandA wrote:North-South rail link was quoted at $1 - $2 Billion, which was before the "Big Dig" ballooned to ~$16 Billion+. To justify that cost you need New York City levels of train traffic. Essentially a replacement for the Atlantic Ave. El and the old street running freight.Was that $1-2B before or after NSRW turned into the six(?)-portal + Central Station massive proposal it became? (Cue F-Line... )
Grand Junction - to serve as a rail link, at a minimum needs a loop track around Beacon Park. Easy and cheap to design and build now, will be impossible after Harvard & Ma$$Pike redevelop.