David Benton wrote:Welcome back.
Thank you very much David. Nice to be missed.
David Benton wrote:The autonomous vehicle is a game changer for the groups you mention. (especially the rapidly growing older age group). No longer been able to drive is a huge loss of freedom, for a generation that has driven all their life. But they are still likely to take a train , providing they can get to and from it. Noone has been able to explain to me how autonomous vehicles will reduce traffic congestion , rather than add to it, despite it been one of the main benefits touted. They are 5 to 10 years away from reality anyway. Autonomous trains are here already.
I think they made the right decision to leave /enable rail capability.
You actually make another good point by implication ... Ford very easily could have said, "we are tearing out the passenger concourse and tracks in order to add additional square footage to help support our return on investment." I can assure you this is something their property managers would have considered.
No one would have batted an eye and the whole situation would have been explained away with statements like, "The site is not expected to see a return of passenger rail service given the investment required. We are thankful for Ford's generous contribution to the rebuilding of Detroit and look forward to joining them at the Grand Opening."
Done. Finished. No further statement necessary.
Instead we have a near polar opposite of four "passenger" tracks being preserved. I emphasize the use of the word "passenger". They could have said "infrastructure", or "rails" or "track space" or some other generic smoke term but they didn't. Those tracks are staying because the plan is keeping the option open for Michigan Central Station to serve as a rail passenger station once again.
It just doesn't get any better than this ... Nothing else would even come close.