A letter in the September '09 Trains seems to have elicited some questions and comments, but I can't seem to get a definitive answer. The writer claimed that his Icom IC-V8 ham radio performed much better than garden variety scanners (in terms of range and sensitivity), specifically because 2-meter ham gear is better tuned to railroad frequencies.
I have not been able to confirm or deny this, thru' an online search and by asking friends...all I've found is a decidely split decision.
Among the IC-V8's claims to fame are modest price (around $100) and mil-spec ruggedness.
So, what is the collective thought on this? Would the IC-v8 be a better alternative to a regular scanner; let me say that RR communication is my main interest. Be gentle with your explanations; I'm pretty much of a technodunce.
Malley
I have not been able to confirm or deny this, thru' an online search and by asking friends...all I've found is a decidely split decision.
Among the IC-V8's claims to fame are modest price (around $100) and mil-spec ruggedness.
So, what is the collective thought on this? Would the IC-v8 be a better alternative to a regular scanner; let me say that RR communication is my main interest. Be gentle with your explanations; I'm pretty much of a technodunce.
Malley