charlie6017 wrote:I'm not trying to sound naive about it, but maybe I am........why would the LV (or any other carrier) want to tone down the usage of pushers to its customers? Is it a fear of possible damage to the goods they are carrying? Just curious............
Thanks,
Charlie
Pushers and grades = potentially slower railroad..not something you want your customers to focus on when choosing which railroad to use.
the LV had three major competitors on the New York City to Buffalo route,
New York Central, DL&W and Erie..
each route had advantages and disadvantages..
grades and pushers is definately a disadvantage..
I think the DL&W was technically the shortest route, in miles..but they had heavy grades..
(the main reason the DL&W mainline does not exist today.)
New York Central was longest, but was very flat. (the main reason it still exists today)
LV and Erie were somewhere in the middle in terms of length and grades..
to gain customers, you want to emphasize the advantages of your route, compared to your competitors routes,
and downplay any disadvantages..thats a possible reason the LV wuld have "kept quiet" about minor grades..or so im guessing.
like I said, some grades were just "common knowledge" and couldnt be hushed-up..everyone knew about them.
Dansville Hill, the Poconos, etc..there is no hiding those!
but perhaps not so with "minor" grades like this possible Buffalo pusher district we are discussing..
Scot